Use of Swedish smokeless tobacco (snus) and the risk of Type 2 diabetes and latent autoimmune diabetes of adulthood (LADA)
Abstract
Aims: It has been suggested that moist snuff (snus), a smokeless tobacco product that is high in nicotine and widespread in Scandinavia, increases the risk of Type 2 diabetes. Previous studies are however few, contradictory and, with regard to autoimmune diabetes, lacking. Our aim was to study the association between snus use and the risk of Type 2 diabetes and latent autoimmune diabetes of adulthood (LADA). Method: Analyses were based on incident cases (Type 2 diabetes, n = 724; LADA, n = 200) and population‐based controls (n = 699) from a Swedish case–control study. Additional analyses were performed on cross‐sectional data from the Norwegian HUNT study (n = 21 473) with 829 prevalent cases of Type 2 diabetes. Odds ratios (OR) were estimated adjusted for age, BMI family history of diabetes and smoking. Only men were included. Results: No association between snus use and Type 2 diabetes or LADA was seen in the Swedish data. For Type 2 diabetes, the OR for > 10 box‐years was 1.00 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.47 to 2.11] and for LADA 1.01 (95% CI, 0.45 to 2.29). Similarly, in HUNT, the OR for Type 2 diabetes in ever‐users was estimated at 0.91 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.10) and in heavy users at 0.92 (95% CI, 0.46 to 1.83). Conclusion: The risk of Type 2 diabetes and LADA is unrelated to the use of snus, despite its high nicotine content. This opens the possibility of the increased risk of Type 2 diabetes seen in smokers may not be attributed to nicotine, but to other substances in tobacco smoke.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is no association between snus use and odds of diabetes type 2 in a Swedish study (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.47-2.11) and in a Norwegian study (OR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.75-1.10 for ever users; OR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.46-1.83 for heavy users).
“No association between snus use and odds of diabetes type 2 in Swedish study (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.47-2.11)and in Norwegian study (OR = 0.91; 95% CI; 0.75-1.10for diabetes type 2 in snus ever users; OR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.46-1.83for diabetes type 2 in heavy snus users) (Rasouli et al. 2017)”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Rasouli et al. 2017
There is no association between using snus and odds of diabetes type 2 or latent autoimmune diabetes in adults in Swedish and Norwegian studies.
“no association between using snus and odds of diabetes type 2 or latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) in Swedish study (OR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.47-2.11for diabetes type 2; OR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.45-2.29 for LADA), as well as in Norwegian study (OR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.75-1.10for diabetes type 2 in snus ever users; OR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.46-1.83for diabetes type 2 in heavy snus users) (Rasouli et al.”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Rasouli et al. 2017
Cites
Active Smoking and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Willi, C., Bodenmann, P., Ghali, W. A., Faris, P. D., & Cornuz, J. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.22.2654 · Cited by 1,268 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Past, present and future of latent autoimmune diabetes in adults
Liu, B., Xiang, Y., Liu, Z., & Zhou, Z. (2020) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.3205 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Kopa-Stojak, P. N., & Pawliczak, R. (2026) · Exposure and Health · doi:10.1007/s12403-026-00812-w
- Authors
- Rasouli, B., Andersson, T., Carlsson, P. ‐., Grill, V., Groop, L., Martinell, M., Midthjell, K., Storm, P., Tuomi, T., & Carlsson, S.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-07-31
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 514-521
- ISSN
- 0742-3071
- 1464-5491
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Medicinska Forskningsrådet
- Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
- AFA Försäkring
- Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review