Cited by 25Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchChronic Disease Management Strategies

Exploring organizational support for the provision of structured self-management education for people with type 2 diabetes: findings from a qualitative study

Open access
Carey, M. E., Agarwal, S., Horne, R., Davies, M., Slevin, M., Coates, V.·2019·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

AIM: To explore the organizational context in which Type 2 diabetes structured group education is provided. METHODS: Four Clinical Commissioning Groups in England providing Type 2 diabetes structured self-management education participated in a qualitative study exploring the context for provision of that education. Using UK National Diabetes Audit returns, two Clinical Commissioning Groups were selected that had non-attendance rates of ≤25%, and two that had non-attendance rates of ≥50%. Between May 2016 and August 2017, 20 interviews were conducted with Clinical Commissioning Group staff including: commissioners, healthcare professionals, managers, general practitioners and diabetes educators. Data gathering was prolonged as it proved challenging to engage with healthcare staff as a result of frequent local restructuring and service disruption. RESULTS: Local audits revealed discrepancies in basic data such as referral and attendance numbers compared with national audit data. There was a commonality in the themes identified from interviews: diabetes education was rarely embedded in service structure; where education uptake was poor, a lack of central support to delivery teams was noticeable; and where education uptake was positive, delivery teams were actively engaged, sometimes relying on enthusiastic individuals. Both situations put the local sustainability of diabetes education at risk. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a link between attendance rates and organizational issues, therefore, when considering how to increase attendance rates, the state of the diabetes education infrastructure should be reviewed. Good uptake of diabetes education can be too reliant on the enthusiastic commitment of small teams or individuals delivering the education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dme.13946

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carey, M. E., Agarwal, S., Horne, R., Davies, M., Slevin, M., & Coates, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (GB)
  • Belfast Health and Social Care Trust (GB)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
Corresponding author
Carey, M. E.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-04-07
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
761-770
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W2921168495
Cited by
25
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Diabetes UK (BDA:11/0004632)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, diabetes education, organizational support, clinical commissioning groups, health care delivery, diabetes educators
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Attitude of Health Personnel, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, England, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Participation, Professional-Patient Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Training Support, Qualitative Research, Clinical Audit, General Practitioners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review