Cited by 65Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

State of the art: understanding and integration of the social context in diabetes care

Open access
de Wit, M., Trief, P. M., Huber, J. W., Willaing, I.·2020·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

We review the past 25 years of research addressing challenges people living with diabetes experience in their daily lives related to social contexts, i.e. in their family, at work and in society at large, and identify research gaps. We found that young people with diabetes, as they develop through to adulthood, are exposed to considerable risks to their physical and mental health. Family‐system interventions have had mixed outcomes. Research in this area would benefit from attention to ethnic/cultural diversity, and involving fathers and other family members. In adults with diabetes, social support relates to better diabetes outcomes. While family member involvement in care is likely to affect health and psychosocial outcomes of the person with diabetes, key elements and mediators of effective family interventions need to be identified. The challenges of diabetes management at work are under‐researched; distress and intentional hyperglycaemia are common. When depression is comorbid with diabetes, there are increased work‐related risks, e.g. unemployment, sickness absence and reduced income. Research to support people with diabetes at work should involve colleagues and employers to raise awareness and create supportive environments. Stigma and discrimination have been found to be more common than previously acknowledged, affecting self‐care, well‐being and access to health services. Guidance on stigma‐reducing choice of language has been published recently. Resilience, defined as successful adaptation to adversity such as stigma and discrimination, requires studies relevant to the specific challenges of diabetes, whether at diagnosis or subsequently. The importance of the social context for living well with diabetes is now fully recognized, but understanding of many of the challenges, whether at home or work, is still limited, with much work needed to develop successful interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dme.14226

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lack of social support or feeling 'policed' by family, friends, or coworkers also evokes emotional distress in individuals with type 1 diabetes.

    “Lack of social support or feeling “policed” by family, friends, or coworkers also evokes emotional distress in individuals with type 1 diabetes (170).”

    From The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) (2021) · cites this paper as [170]

    The ‘Diabetes in youth’ section links family conflict and peer relationships to psychosocial outcomes in adolescents with type 1 diabetes; the work-life section reports work-related distress in people with type 1 diabetes. The paper does not specifically describe feeling ‘policed’ by family, friends, or coworkers, or establish that those interactions evoke emotional distress across individuals with type 1 diabetes. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. [1]Engel GL. The biopsychosocial model and the education of health professionals. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1978; 310: 169– 187. 290321
  2. [2]Bronfenbrenner U. Measuring environment across the life span: Emerging methods and concepts. Friedman SL, Wachs TD, editors. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press; 1999.
  3. [5]Wiebe DJ, Helgeson V, Berg CA. The social context of managing diabetes across the life span. Am Psychol 2016; 71: 526– 538. 27690482 PMC5094275
  4. [6]Markowitz JT, Garvey KC, Laffel LM. Developmental changes in the roles of patients and families in type 1 diabetes management. Curr Diabetes Rev 2015; 11: 231– 238. 25901503 PMC4826732
  5. [7]Anderson BJ. Behavioral research in pediatric diabetes: putting the evidence to work for advocacy and education. Pediatr Diabetes 2012; 13: 77– 80. 21545676
  6. [8]Jaser SS. Family interaction in pediatric diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 2011; 11: 480– 485. 21853415 PMC3370388
  7. [9]Eilander MMA, Snoek FJ, Rotteveel J, Aanstoot HJ, Bakker‐van Waarde WM, Houdijk E et al Parental Diabetes Behaviors and Distress Are Related to Glycemic Control in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: Longitudinal Data from the DINO Study. J Diabetes Res 2017; 2017: 1462064. 29376080 PMC5742467
  8. [10]Anderson BJ. Parenting styles and parenting practices in pediatric diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 1885– 1886. 21788645 PMC3142018
  9. [11]Vloemans AF, Eilander MMA, Rotteveel J, Bakker‐van Waarde WM, Houdijk E, Nuboer R et al Youth With Type 1 Diabetes Taking Responsibility for Self‐Management: The Importance of Executive Functioning in Achieving Glycemic Control: Results From the Longitudinal DINO Study. Diabetes Care 2019; 42: 225– 231. 30552132
  10. [12]Kovacs M, Obrosky DS, Goldston D, Drash A. Major depressive disorder in youths with IDDM. A controlled prospective study of course and outcome. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 45– 51. 9028692
  11. [13]Palladino DK, Helgeson VS. Friends or foes? A review of peer influence on self‐care and glycemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Psychol 2012; 37: 591– 603. 22460759 PMC3356563
  12. [14]Raymaekers K, Oris L, Prikken S, Moons P, Goossens E, Weets I et al The Role of Peers for Diabetes Management in Adolescents and Emerging Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Longitudinal Study. Diabetes Care 2017; 40: 1678– 1684. 29138272
  13. [16]Feldman MA, Anderson LM, Shapiro JB, Jedraszko AM, Evans M, Weil LEG et al Family‐Based Interventions Targeting Improvements in Health and Family Outcomes of Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: a Systematic Review. Curr Diab Rep 2018; 18: 15. 29457190
  14. [17]Anderson BJ, Auslander WF. Research on diabetes management and the family: a critique. Diabetes Care 1980; 3: 696– 702. 7004815
  15. [18]Fisher L, Chesla CA, Bartz RJ, Gilliss C, Skaff MA, Sabogal F et al The family and type 2 diabetes: a framework for intervention. Diabetes Educ 1998; 24: 599– 607. 9830956
  16. [19]Strom JL, Egede LE. The impact of social support on outcomes in adult patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Curr Diab Rep 2012; 12: 769– 781. 22949135 PMC3490012
  17. [20]Rintala TM, Jaatinen P, Paavilainen E, Astedt‐Kurki P. Interrelation between adult persons with diabetes and their family: a systematic review of the literature. J Fam Nurs 2013; 19: 3– 28. 23288886
  18. [21]Fisher L, Weihs KL. Can addressing family relationships improve outcomes in chronic disease? Report of the National Working Group on Family‐Based Interventions in Chronic Disease. J Fam Pract 2000; 49: 561– 566. 10923558
  19. [22]Trief PM, Fisher LM, Hopkins R. Family Therapies for Adults with Diabetes In: Delamater A, Marrero D, eds. Behavioral Diabetes: Ecological Perspectives for Pediatric and Adult Populations: Springer Publishing Co., 2018.
  20. [23]Trief PM, Fisher L, Sandberg J, Cibula DA, Dimmock J, Hessler DM et al Health and Psychosocial Outcomes of a Telephonic Couples Behavior Change Intervention in Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care 2016; 39: 2165– 2173. 27456837 PMC5127234
  21. [24]Marrero DG, Ard J, Delamater AM, Peragallo‐Dittko V, Mayer‐Davis EJ, Nwankwo R et al Twenty‐first century behavioral medicine: a context for empowering clinicians and patients with diabetes: a consensus report. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 463– 470. 23349150 PMC3554311
  22. [25]Von Korff M, Katon W, Lin EH, Simon G, Ciechanowski P, Ludman E et al Work disability among individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 1326– 1332. 15920047
  23. [26]Nexo MA, Carlsen K, Pedersen J, Hetland ML, Watt T, Hansen SM et al Long‐term sickness absence of 32 chronic conditions: a Danish register‐based longitudinal study with up to 17 years of follow‐up. BMJ Open 2018; 8: e020874. PMC6042549 29961016
  24. [27]Persson S, Dahlquist G, Gerdtham UG, Steen Carlsson K. Swedish Childhood Diabetes Study G. Why childhood‐onset type 1 diabetes impacts labour market outcomes: a mediation analysis. Diabetologia 2018; 61: 342– 353. 29170854 PMC6448960
  25. [28]Breton MC, Guenette L, Amiche MA, Kayibanda JF, Gregoire JP, Moisan J. Burden of diabetes on the ability to work: a systematic review. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 740– 749. 23431092 PMC3579337
  26. [29]O'Neil A, Williams ED, Browne JL, Horne R, Pouwer F, Speight J. Associations between economic hardship and markers of self‐management in adults with type 2 diabetes: results from Diabetes MILES ‐ Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 2014; 38: 466– 472. 24750399
  27. [30]Ruston A, Smith A, Fernando B. Diabetes in the workplace ‐ diabetic's perceptions and experiences of managing their disease at work: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2013; 13: 386. 23617727 PMC3649948
  28. [31]Hakkarainen P, Moilanen L, Hanninen V, Heikkinen J, Rasanen K. Work‐related diabetes distress among Finnish workers with type 1 diabetes: a national cross‐sectional survey. J Occup Med Toxicol 2016; 11: 11. 27006684 PMC4802881
  29. [32]Detaille SI, Haafkens JA, Hoekstra JB, van Dijk FJ. What employees with diabetes mellitus need to cope at work: views of employees and health professionals. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 64: 183– 190. 16469470
  30. [33]Hansen UM, Cleal B, Willaing I, Tjornhoj‐Thomsen T. Managing type 1 diabetes in the context of work life: A matter of containment. Soc Sci Med 2018; 219: 70– 77. 30391872
  31. [34]Hansen UM, Olesen K, Willaing I. Diabetes stigma and its association with diabetes outcomes: A cross‐sectional study of adults with type 1 diabetes. Scand J Public Health 2019. 32338563
  32. [35]Olesen K, Cleal B, Skinner T, Willaing I. Characteristics associated with non‐disclosure of Type 2 diabetes at work. Diabet Med 2017; 34: 1116– 1119. 28523854
  33. [36]Rutter M. Resilience in the face of adversity. Protective factors and resistance to psychiatric disorder. Br J Psychiatry 1985; 147: 598– 611. 3830321
  34. [38]Schabert J, Browne JL, Mosely K, Speight J. Social stigma in diabetes: a framework to understand a growing problem for an increasing epidemic. Patient 2013; 6: 1– 10. 23322536
  35. [39]Stuckey HL, Mullan‐Jensen CB, Reach G, Kovacs Burns K, Piana N, Vallis M et al Personal accounts of the negative and adaptive psychosocial experiences of people with diabetes in the second Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN2) study. Diabetes Care 2014; 37: 2466– 2474. 24973437
  36. [40]Holt RI, Nicolucci A, Kovacs Burns K, Escalante M, Forbes A, Hermanns N et al Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs second study (DAWN2): cross‐national comparisons on barriers and resources for optimal care––healthcare professional perspective. Diabet Med 2013; 30: 789– 798. 23710839
  37. [41]Liu NF, Brown AS, Folias AE, Younge MF, Guzman SJ, Close KL et al Stigma in People With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes. Clin Diabetes 2017; 35: 27– 34. 28144043 PMC5241772
  38. [42]Abdoli S, Doosti Irani M, Hardy LR, Funnell M. A discussion paper on stigmatizing features of diabetes. Nurs Open 2018; 5: 113– 119. 29599986 PMC5867293
  39. [43]Charney DS. Psychobiological mechanisms of resilience and vulnerability: implications for successful adaptation to extreme stress. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161: 195– 216. 14754765
  40. [44]Yi‐Frazier JP, Smith RE, Vitaliano PP, Yi JC, Mai S, Hillman M et al A Person‐Focused Analysis of Resilience Resources and Coping in Diabetes Patients. Stress Health 2010; 26: 51– 60. 20526415 PMC2880488
  41. [45]Yi‐Frazier JP, Yaptangco M, Semana S, Buscaino E, Thompson V, Cochrane K et al The association of personal resilience with stress, coping, and diabetes outcomes in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: variable‐ and person‐focused approaches. J Health Psychol 2015; 20: 1196– 1206. 24271691 PMC5106185
  42. [46]Walker AF, Johnson C, Schatz DA, Silverstein JH, Lyles S, Rohrs HJ. Using photography as a method to explore adolescent challenges and resilience in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Spectr 2015; 28: 92– 98. 25987807 PMC4433084
  43. [48]Lloyd CE, Wilson A, Holt RIG, Whicher C, Kar P. Language Matters Group. Language matters: a UK perspective. Diabet Med 2018; 35: 1635– 1641. 30103276
  44. [50]Thornicroft G, Mehta N, Clement S, Evans‐Lacko S, Doherty M, Rose D et al Evidence for effective interventions to reduce mental‐health‐related stigma and discrimination. Lancet 2016; 387: 1123– 1132. 26410341

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Wit, M., Trief, P. M., Huber, J. W., & Willaing, I.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Medical Psychology Amsterdam Public Health Amsterdam The Netherlands
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
  • University of Brighton (GB)
  • Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-01-24
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
473-482
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W3000282802
Cited by
65
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen (SDCC HP 2. A. Diabetes Mgmt Res)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK111022)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
diabetes management, social environment, family intervention, social support, comorbid depression, stigma, discrimination, resilience, youth with diabetes, unemployment, sick leave, ethnic and cultural diversity, fathers
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Family, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Mental Health, Self Care, Social Environment, Social Support, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review