Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 387

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Empagliflozin improves glycaemic and weight control as add‐on therapy to pioglitazone or pioglitazone plus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24‐week, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial

Kovacs, C. S., Seshiah, V., Swallow, R., Jones, R., Rattunde, H., Woerle, H. J., Broedl, U. C., on behalf of the EMPA‐REG PIO™ trial investigators·2014·Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Abstract

Aims: This study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of empagliflozin as add‐on to pioglitazone ± metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes ( T2DM ). Methods: Patients with HbA1c ≥7 and ≤10% were randomized and treated with once daily empagliflozin 10 mg (n = 165), empagliflozin 25 mg (n = 168) or placebo (n = 165) as add‐on to pioglitazone ± metformin for 24 weeks. Endpoints included changes from baseline in HbA1c (primary endpoint), fasting plasma glucose ( FPG ) and body weight at week 24. Results: Adjusted mean ± standard error changes in HbA1c were −0.6 ± 0.07% and −0.7 ± 0.07% with empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg, respectively, vs. −0.1 ± 0.07% with placebo (both p < 0.001). More patients with HbA1c ≥7% at baseline achieved HbA1c <7% with empagliflozin 10 mg (23.8%) and 25 mg (30.0%) vs. placebo (7.7%) (both p < 0.001). FPG decreased with empagliflozin (−0.94 mmol/l for 10 mg and −1.22 mmol/l for 25 mg) and increased with placebo (+0.36 mmol/l; both p < 0.001). Adjusted mean ± standard error changes in weight were −1.62 ± 0.21 kg and −1.47 ± 0.21 kg with empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg, respectively, vs. +0.34 ± 0.21 kg with placebo (both p < 0.001). Similar proportions of patients reported adverse events with empagliflozin (67.3–71.4%) and placebo (72.7%). Confirmed hypoglycaemia was reported by 1.2–2.4% of patients on empagliflozin and 1.8% on placebo. Conclusion: Empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg once daily for 24 weeks as add‐on to pioglitazone ± metformin reduced HbA1c , FPG and weight and were well tolerated in patients with T2DM .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dom.12188

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 387

Metadata

Authors
Kovacs, C. S., Seshiah, V., Swallow, R., Jones, R., Rattunde, H., Woerle, H. J., Broedl, U. C., & on behalf of the EMPA‐REG PIO™ trial investigators
Venue
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-08-22
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
147-158
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
OpenAlex
W2051243940
Cited by
387
References
4
FWCI
35.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Empagliflozin improves glycaemic and weight control as add‐on therapy to pioglitazone or pioglitazone plus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24‐week, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/dom.12188
The paper
Kovacs, C. S., Seshiah, V., Swallow, R., Jones, R., Rattunde, H., Woerle, H. J., Broedl, U. C., & on behalf of the EMPA‐REG PIO™ trial investigators. (2014). Empagliflozin improves glycaemic and weight control as add‐on therapy to pioglitazone or pioglitazone plus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24‐week, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12188

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.