Cited by 40Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Fat‐free mass loss generated with weight loss in overweight and obese adults: what may we expect?

Dixon, J. B., Lambert, E. A., Grima, M., Rice, T., Lambert, G. W., Straznicky, N. E.·2015·Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Abstract

There is concern that intentional weight loss may generate excessive loss of fat‐free mass (FFM). Idealists target minimal loss of FFM, while others consider that FFM loss of up to 25% of weight loss is acceptable. In a cross‐sectional study of 275 weight‐stable, overweight or obese adults, we used whole‐body dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry to measure FFM. A range of models was used to estimate the expected ΔFFM/Δweight ratio required to attain the body composition of a weight‐stable individual at a lower body mass index (BMI). Higher BMI was associated linearly with higher FFM in men and women. Proportional ΔFFM/Δweight was influenced by sex, BMI and age. Direct scatter plot analysis, quadratic curve fit modelling and linear FFM–BMI modelling provided similar estimates for each model of ΔFFM/Δweight ratio, with 40% for men and 33% for women. These results show that the 25% rule is inappropriate and our estimates are higher than those generally reported after intentional weight loss indicating favourable preservation of FFM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dom.12389

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dixon, J. B., Lambert, E. A., Grima, M., Rice, T., Lambert, G. W., & Straznicky, N. E.
Affiliations
  • Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
  • Clinical Obesity Research, Baker IDI Heart & Diabetes Institute Melbourne Australia
Corresponding author
Dixon, J. B.
Venue
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-09-28
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
91-93
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
OpenAlex
W2042635293
Cited by
40
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
fat-free mass loss, weight loss, obesity, overweight adults, body composition, body mass index, sex differences, age effects, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Composition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Muscular Atrophy, Nutrition Surveys, Obesity, Sex Characteristics, United States, Victoria, Cohort Studies, Weight Loss, Absorptiometry, Photon, Body Mass Index, Muscle Development, White People, Overweight, Whole Body Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review