Cited by 110Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

One‐year sustained glycaemic control and less hypoglycaemia with new insulin glargine 300 U/ml compared with 100 U/ml in people with type 2 diabetes using basal plus meal‐time insulin: the EDITION 1 12‐month randomized trial, including 6‐month extension

Open access
Riddle, M. C., Yki‐Järvinen, H., Bolli, G. B., Ziemen, M., Muehlen‐Bartmer, I., Cissokho, S., Home, P. D.·2015·Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the maintenance of efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/ml ( Gla‐300 ) versus glargine 100 U/ml ( Gla‐100 ) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) using basal plus meal‐time insulin for 12 months in the EDITION 1 trial. Methods: EDITION 1 was a multicentre, randomized, open‐label, two‐arm, phase IIIa study. Participants completing the initial 6‐month treatment period continued to receive Gla‐300 or Gla‐100 , as previously randomized, once daily for a further 6‐month open‐label extension phase. Changes in glycated haemoglobin ( HbA1c ) and fasting plasma glucose concentrations, insulin dose, hypoglycaemic events and body weight were assessed. Results: Of 807 participants enrolled in the initial phase, 89% (359/404) assigned to Gla‐300 and 88% (355/403) assigned to Gla‐100 completed 12 months. Glycaemic control was sustained in both groups (mean HbA1c : Gla‐300 , 7.24%; Gla‐100 , 7.42%), with more sustained HbA1c reduction for Gla‐300 at 12 months: least squares mean difference Gla‐300 vs Gla‐100 : HbA1c −0.17 [95% confidence interval ( CI ) −0.30 to −0.05]%. The mean daily basal insulin dose at 12 months was 1.03 U/kg for Gla‐300 and 0.90 U/kg for Gla‐100 . Lower percentages of participants had ≥1 confirmed [≤3.9 mmol/l (≤70 mg/dl)] or severe hypoglycaemic event with Gla‐300 than Gla‐100 at any time of day [24 h; 86 vs 92%; relative risk 0.94 (95% CI 0.89–0.99)] and during the night [54 vs 65%; relative risk 0.84 (95% CI 0.75–0.94)], while the annualized rates of such hypoglycaemic events were similar. No between‐treatment differences in adverse events were apparent. Conclusion: During 12 months of treatment of T2DM requiring basal and meal‐time insulin, glycaemic control was better sustained and fewer individuals reported hypoglycaemia with Gla‐300 than with Gla‐100 . The mean basal insulin dose was higher with Gla‐300 compared with Gla‐100 , but total numbers of hypoglycaemic events and overall tolerability did not differ between treatments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dom.12472

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Bolli GB Andreoli AM Lucidi P Optimizing the replacement of basal insulin in type 1 diabetes mellitus: no longer an elusive goal in the post-NPH era Diabetes Technol Ther 2011 13 S43 52 (Suppl. 1) 21668336
  2. Tibaldi JM Evolution of insulin development: focus on key parameters Adv Ther 2012 29 590 619 22843207
  3. Korytkowski M When oral agents fail: practical barriers to starting insulin Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002 26 S18 24 (Suppl. 3) 12174319
  4. Garber AJ Will the next generation of basal insulins offer clinical advantages? Diabetes Obes Metab 2014 16 483 491 24118819
  5. Becker RH Dahmen R Bergmann K Lehmann A Jax T Heise T New insulin glargine 300 units.mL-1 provides a more even activity profile and prolonged glycemic control at steady state compared with insulin glargine 100 units.mL-1 Diabetes Care 2015 38 637 643 25150159
  6. Riddle MC Bolli GB Ziemen M Muehlen-Bartmer I Bizet F Home PD New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using basal and mealtime insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 1) Diabetes Care 2014 37 2755 2762 25078900
  7. Yki-Jarvinen H Bergenstal R Ziemen M New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using oral agents and basal insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 2) Diabetes Care 2014 37 3235 3243 25193531
  8. Bolli GB Riddle MC Bergenstal RM New insulin glargine 300 U/ml compared with glargine 100 U/ml in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes on oral glucose-lowering drugs: a randomized controlled trial (EDITION 3) Diabetes Obes Metab 2015 17 386 394 25641260 PMC4409854
  9. Lewis KS Bradley C Knight G Boulton AJ Ward JD A measure of treatment satisfaction designed specifically for people with insulin-dependent diabetes Diabet Med 1988 5 235 242 2967144
  10. American Diabetes Association Defining and reporting hypoglycemia in diabetes: a report from the American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycemia Diabetes Care 2005 28 1245 1249 15855602
  11. Steinstraesser A Schmidt R Bergmann K Dahmen R Becker RH Investigational new insulin glargine 300 U/ml has the same metabolism as insulin glargine 100 U/ml Diabetes Obes Metab 2014 16 873 876 24571126 PMC4237557
  12. Lucidi P Porcellati F Candeloro P Glargine metabolism over 24 h following its subcutaneous injection in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a dose-response study Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2014 24 709 716 24702815

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riddle, M. C., Yki‐Järvinen, H., Bolli, G. B., Ziemen, M., Muehlen‐Bartmer, I., Cissokho, S., & Home, P. D.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • University of Perugia (IT)
  • Sanofi (Germany) (DE)
  • Sanofi‐Aventis Deutschland GmbH Frankfurt am Main Germany
  • Keyrus Biopharma Levallois‐Perret France
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Riddle, M. C.
Venue
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-05-11
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
835-842
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
OpenAlex
W1544349623
Cited by
110
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 5
FWCI
18.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Sanofi
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
insulin glargine 300 U/mL, insulin glargine 100 U/mL, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, hypoglycemia, basal insulin dose, long-acting insulin analogues, body weight, treatment efficacy and safety
MeSH terms
Insulin Glargine, Aged, Blood Glucose, Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Therapy, Combination, Fasting, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Meals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review