Cited by 72Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Postprandial Hypoglycaemia after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and the Effects of Acarbose, Sitagliptin, Verapamil, Liraglutide and Pasireotide

Øhrstrøm, Caroline Christfort, Worm, Dorte, Højager, Anna, Andersen, Ditte, Holst, Jens Juul, Kielgast, Urd Lynge, Hansen, Dorte Lindqvist·2019·Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Abstract

Aim To investigate the effects of acarbose, sitagliptin, verapamil, liraglutide and pasireotide on post-bariatric hypoglycaemia (PBH) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Materials and methods In a randomized crossover study, 11 women who had undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and had documented hypoglycaemia were each evaluated during a baseline period without treatment and during five treatment periods with the following interventions: acarbose 50 mg for 1 week, sitagliptin 100 mg for 1 week, verapamil 120 mg for 1 week, liraglutide 1.2 mg for 3 weeks and pasireotide 300 μg as a single dose. Treatment effects were evaluated by a mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) and, for all treatment periods except pasireotide, by 6 days of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Results Treatment with acarbose and treatment with pasireotide both significantly lifted nadir glucose levels (mean ± SEM 3.9 ± 0.2 and 7.9 ± 0.4 vs 3.4 ± 0.2; P Conclusions In an experimental setting, treatment with acarbose and pasireotide reduced PBH. Acarbose appears to have an overall glucose-stabilizing effect, whereas pasireotide leads to increased and sustained hyperglycaemia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dom.13796

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Øhrstrøm, C. C., Worm, D., Højager, A., Andersen, D., Holst, J. J., Kielgast, U. L., & Hansen, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Zealand University Hospital Køge (DK)
  • Amager Hospital (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Øhrstrøm, Caroline Christfort
Venue
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-06-24
Volume
21
Issue
9
Pages
2142-2151
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
OpenAlex
W2947147808
Cited by
72
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
7.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Familien Hede Nielsens Fond
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
postprandial hypoglycemia, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, bariatric surgery, acarbose, sitagliptin, verapamil, liraglutide, pasireotide, mixed meal tolerance test, continuous glucose monitoring, glycemic variability, hyperglycemia, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon-like peptide-1
MeSH terms
Sitagliptin Phosphate, Liraglutide, Adult, Blood Glucose, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Postoperative Complications, Somatostatin, Verapamil, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Gastric Bypass, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies, Postprandial Period, Acarbose, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review