Cited by 27Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthLipid metabolism and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Inclisiran in individuals with diabetes or obesity: Post hoc pooled analyses of the ORION ‐9, ORION ‐10 and ORION ‐11 Phase 3 randomized trials

Open access
Leiter, Lawrence A., Raal, Frederick J., Schwartz, Gregory G., Koenig, Wolfgang, Ray, Kausik K., Landmesser, Ulf, Han, Jackie, Conde, Lorena Garcia +1 more·2024·Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Abstract

Aims: To conduct a pooled analysis of Phase 3 trials investigating the efficacy and safety of inclisiran across glycaemic and body mass index (BMI) strata. Materials and Methods: Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 300 mg inclisiran sodium or placebo twice yearly, after initial and 3‐month doses up to 18 months, with background oral lipid‐lowering therapy. Analyses were stratified by glycaemic status (normoglycaemia, prediabetes, and diabetes) or BMI (<25, ≥25 to <30, ≥30 to <35, and ≥35 kg/m 2 ). Co‐primary endpoints were percentage and time‐adjusted percentage change in low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from baseline. Safety was also assessed. Results: Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment arms and across strata. Percent LDL cholesterol change (placebo‐corrected) with inclisiran from baseline to Day 510 ranged from −47.6% to −51.9% and from −48.8% to −54.4% across glycaemic/BMI strata, respectively. Similarly, time‐adjusted percentage changes after Day 90 and up to Day 540 ranged from −46.8% to −52.0% and from −48.6% to −53.3% across glycaemic/BMI strata, respectively. Inclisiran led to significant reductions in proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 and other atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins versus placebo across the glycaemic/BMI strata. The proportions of individuals achieving LDL cholesterol thresholds of <1.8 mmol/L and <1.4 mmol/L with inclisiran increased with increasing glycaemic and BMI strata. Across the glycaemic/BMI strata, a higher proportion of individuals had mild/moderate treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) at the injection site with inclisiran (2.8%–7.7%) versus placebo (0.2%–2.1%). Conclusion: Inclisiran provided substantial and sustained LDL cholesterol lowering across glycaemic/BMI strata, with a modest excess of transient mild‐to‐moderate TEAEs at the injection site.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dom.15650

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ORION-9, −10 and −11 combined in a pooled analysis (n = 3,658) demonstrated LDL-C reductions of 47.6% to 51.9% between different glycemic groups and 48.8% to 54.4% between different BMI groups.

    “ORION-9, −10 and − 11 combined in a pooled analysis (n = 3,658) demonstrated LDL-C reductions of 47.6% to 51.9% between different glycemic groups including normoglycemia, prediabetes and diabetes and 48.8% to 54.4% between different BMI groups from underweight (< 25 kg/m²) to obesity (≥ 35 kg/m²) [40].”

    From Inclisiran SiRNA therapy for durable LDL-C reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting a breakthrough in long-term cardiovascular risk management (2026) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Study population section reports a pooled sample of 3,658, and Figure 1 reports the cited Day 510 LDL-C reduction ranges across glycaemic and BMI groups. However, the citing sentence calls the <25 kg/m² BMI group “underweight”; the paper classifies it as “normal” (Population section). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The analysis of 11 RCTs for quantitative synthesis included more than 13,000 participants and showed inclisiran produces significant LDL-C reduction versus placebo treatment.

    “The analysis of 11 RCTs for quantitative synthesis included more than 13,000 participants showed inclisiran produces significant LDL-C reduction versus placebo treatment [24, 25, 38–44, 46, 49].”

    From Inclisiran SiRNA therapy for durable LDL-C reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting a breakthrough in long-term cardiovascular risk management (2026) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Key secondary endpoints section reports lower LDL cholesterol with inclisiran than placebo, with p < 0.001 across the reported glycaemic and BMI strata. But the Methods and Discussion identify this paper as a pooled analysis of three Phase 3 trials, not an analysis of 11 RCTs involving more than 13,000 participants. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Analysis of ORION-1, ORION-9, ORION-10, and ORION-11 revealed that apoB concentrations decreased by 36%-48%.

    “Analysis of ORION-1 and ORION-9 and ORION-10 and ORION-11 revealed that non–HDL-C levels decreased by 38%–50% while apoB concentrations decreased by 36%–48% [40].”

    From Inclisiran SiRNA therapy for durable LDL-C reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting a breakthrough in long-term cardiovascular risk management (2026) · cites this paper as [40]

    Section 3.2.2 reports that apoB percentage changes were significantly greater with inclisiran than placebo across the analysed subgroups. But the Population section specifies that the pooled analysis included ORION-9, ORION-10 and ORION-11, not ORION-1, and the retrieved text does not establish the claimed 36%–48% apoB range. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Analysis of ORION-1, ORION-9, ORION-10, and ORION-11 revealed that non-HDL-C levels decreased by 38%-50%.

    “Analysis of ORION-1 and ORION-9 and ORION-10 and ORION-11 revealed that non–HDL-C levels decreased by 38%–50% while apoB concentrations decreased by 36%–48% [40].”

    From Inclisiran SiRNA therapy for durable LDL-C reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting a breakthrough in long-term cardiovascular risk management (2026) · cites this paper as [40]

    Section 3.2.2 (page unavailable) reports significantly greater reductions in non-HDL cholesterol with inclisiran than with placebo. But the Population section (2.1; page unavailable) identifies only ORION-9, ORION-10 and ORION-11 as included trials, not ORION-1, and the retrieved passages do not establish the stated 38%–50% range. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Cai X, Zhang Y, Li M, et al. Association between prediabetes and risk of all cause mortality and cardiovascular disease: updated meta-analy- sis. BMJ. 2020;370:m2297.
  2. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/- ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/N- LA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:3168-3209.
  3. Powell-Wiley TM, Poirier P, Burke LE, et al. Obesity and cardiovascu- lar disease. A scientific statement from the American Heart Associa- tion. Circulation. 2021;143:e984-e1010.
  4. Wang H, Liu J, Feng Y, Ma A, Wang T. The burden of cardiovascular diseases attributable to metabolic risk factors and its change from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis and prediction. Front Epidemiol. 2023;3:1.
  5. The Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR, et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentra- tion, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010;375:2215-2222.
  6. Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, et al. Health effects of over- weight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:13-27.
  7. Neeland IJ, Ross R, Despres JP, et al. Visceral and ectopic fat, athero- sclerosis, and cardiometabolic disease: a position statement. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7:715-725.
  8. Ference BA, Ginsberg HN, Graham I, et al. Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European atherosclerosis society consensus panel. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2459-2472.
  9. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula M, Badimon L, Chapman MJ, de Backer GG, Delgado V, Ference BA, Graham IM, Halliday A, Landmesser U, Mihaylova B, Pedersen TR, Riccardi G, Richter DJ, Sabatine MS, Taskinen MR, Tokgozoglu L, Wiklund O, Mueller C, Drexel H, Aboyans V, Corsini A; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidae- mias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J 2020;41:111-188.
  10. Fox KM, Tai MH, Kostev K, Hatz M, Qian Y, Laufs U. Treatment pat- terns and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment among patients receiving high-or moderate-intensity statins. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018;107:380-388.
  11. Klimchak AC, Patel MY, Iorga SR, Kulkarni N, Wong ND. Lipid treat- ment and goal attainment characteristics among persons with athero- sclerotic cardiovascular disease in the United States. Am J Prev Cardiol. 2020;1:100010.
  12. Ray KK, Molemans B, Schoonen WM, et al. EU-wide cross-sectional observational study of lipid-modifying therapy use in secondary and primary care: the DA VINCI study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021;28:1279- 1289.
  13. Wright RS, Ray KK, Raal FJ, et al. ORION phase III investigators. Pooled patient-level analysis of inclisiran trials in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia or atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77: 1182-1193.
  14. Mishra A, Castaneda TR, Bader E, et al. Triantennary GalNAc molecu- lar imaging probes for monitoring hepatocyte function in a rat model of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Adv Sci. 2020;7:2002997.
  15. Rega-Kaun G, Ritzel D, Kaun C, et al. Changes of circulating extracel- lular vesicles from the liver after roux-en-Y bariatric surgery. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:2153.
  16. Willoughby JLS, Chan A, Sehgal A, et al. Evaluation of GalNAc-siRNA conjugate activity in pre-clinical animal models with reduced asialo- glycoprotein receptor expression. Mol Ther. 2018;26:105-114.
  17. Witzigmann D, Quagliata L, Schenk SH, Quintavalle C, Terracciano LM, Huwyler J. Variable asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 expression in liver disease: implications for therapeutic intervention. Hepatol Res. 2016;46:686-696.
  18. Robinson JG, Farnier M, Krempf M, et al. Efficacy and safety of aliro- cumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1489-1499.
  19. Catapano ALM, Manu MC, Burden A, Ray KK. LDL-C goal achievement and lipid-lowering therapy in patients by atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease subtype: the SANTORINI study. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:2373.
  20. Lloyd-Jones DM, Morris PB, Ballantyne CM, et al. 2022 ACC expert consensus decision pathway on the role of nonstatin therapies for LDL-cholesterol lowering in the management of atherosclerotic car- diovascular disease risk: a report of the American College of Cardiol- ogy Solution set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80: 1366-1418.
  21. May HT, Knowlton KU, Anderson JL, Lappe DL, Bair TL, Muhlestein JB. High-statin adherence over 5 years of follow-up is associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: results from the IMPRES study. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022;8:352-360.
  22. Ray KK, Ference BA, Severin T, et al. World heart federation choles- terol roadmap 2022. Glob Heart. 2022;17:75.
  23. Rodriguez F, Maron DJ, Knowles JW, Virani SS, Lin S, Heidenreich PA. Association of statin adherence with mortality in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4:206-213.
  24. Shau WY, Lai CL, Huang ST, et al. Statin adherence and persistence on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Taiwan. Heart Asia. 2019;11:e011176.
  25. Underberg J, Toth PP, Rodriguez F. LDL-C target attainment in sec- ondary prevention of ASCVD in the United States: barriers, conse- quences of nonachievement, and strategies to reach goals. Postgrad Med. 2022;134:752-762.
  26. Brandts J, Ray KK. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering strat- egies and population health: time to move to a cumulative exposure model. Circulation. 2020;141:873-876.
  27. Saeedi R, Frohlich J. Lipoprotein (a), an independent cardiovascular risk marker. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;2:1-6.
  28. Mora S, Kamstrup PR, Rifai N, Nordestgaard BG, Buring JE, Ridker PM. Lipoprotein(a) and risk of type 2 diabetes. Clin Chem. 2010;56:1252-1260.
  29. Paige E, Masconi KL, Tsimikas S, et al. Lipoprotein(a) and incident type-2 diabetes: results from the prospective Bruneck study and a meta- analysis of published literature. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017;16:38.
  30. Gudbjartsson DF, Thorgeirsson G, Sulem P, et al. Lipoprotein (a) concentration and risks of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:2982-2994.
  31. Sabatine MS, Leiter LA, Wiviott SD, et al. Cardiovascular safety and efficacy of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab in patients with and without diabetes and the effect of evolocumab on glycaemia and risk of new-onset diabetes: a prespecified analysis of the FOU- RIER randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017; 5(12):941-950.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leiter, L. A., Raal, F. J., Schwartz, G. G., Koenig, W., Ray, K. K., Landmesser, U., Han, J., Conde, L. G., & Wright, R. S.
Affiliations
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technische Universität München Munich Germany
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DE)
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation East Hanover New Jersey USA
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Leiter, Lawrence A.
Venue
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-05-17
Volume
26
Issue
8
Pages
3223-3237
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
OpenAlex
W4397002346
Cited by
27
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 1
FWCI
11.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Imperial College London
  • Novartis Pharma
  • NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
inclisiran, PCSK9 inhibition, LDL cholesterol lowering, diabetes mellitus, obesity, body mass index, prediabetes, glycemic status, treatment-emergent adverse events, injection site reactions, atherogenic lipoproteins
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Double-Blind Method, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, RNA, Small Interfering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review