Cited by 2Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Education

Efficacy of lifestyle intervention in adults with impaired glucose tolerance with and without impaired fasting plasma glucose: A post hoc analysis of Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Outcome Study

Gong·2021·Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism

Abstract

The cover image is based on the Letter to the Editor Insulin requirements are eternally dynamic by Israel Hodish, https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14460.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dom.v23.10

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gong
Venue
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-10
Volume
23
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
OpenAlex
W4241449696
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
insulin requirement, insulin dose adjustment, diabetes management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review