Cited by 15Acne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsDermatology and Skin DiseasesDermatologic Treatments and Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A retrospective assessment and comparison of the effectiveness of benzoyl peroxide; the combination of topical niacinamide, gallic acid, and lauric acid; and the combination of benzoyl peroxide and erythromycin in acne vulgaris

Kozan, Ahmet, Guner, Rukiye Yasak, Akyol, Melih·2020·Dermatologic Therapy

Abstract

Acne vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that mostly develops during adolescence and continues throughout adulthood. It affects the face, the main location of cosmetic appearance. Despite many developments in acne treatment, various combination therapies are needed to create the best option. Ninety patients were included in this study. We used the global acne grading system (GAGS) and the lesion counting and photographic standards that were used by Hayashi et al., to assess acne severity. The patients were randomly divided into three groups as group 1 (using only 5% BPO, twice a day), group 2 (using only the combination of 5% BPO + 3% erythromycin, twice a day), and group 3 (using only the combination of 4% niacinamide + 1% gallic acid + 1% lauric acid, twice a day). Thirty patients were included in each group. The scores were evaluated at weeks 0, 2, 4 and 8, and compared with each other. As a result of the study, all three treatment types were found to be effective. The combination of 4% niacinamide + 1% gallic acid + 1% lauric acid can be used as an alternative topical treatment for acne vulgaris to prevent resistance against topical antibiotics and the side effects of some other treatments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dth.13534

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tuzun Y, 2004, Güncel Akne Tedavisi, Dermatose, 3, 220

Cited by

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
Kozan, A., Guner, R. Y., & Akyol, M.
Affiliations
  • Amasya Üniversitesi (TR)
  • Dermatology Department Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine Sivas Turkey
  • Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi (TR)
Venue
Dermatologic Therapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-06-25
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
e13534-e13534
ISSN
  • 1396-0296 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-8019
OpenAlex
W3023836922
Cited by
15
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dermatologic Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
acne, benzoyl peroxide, nicotinamide, gallic acid, lauric acid, erythromycin, topical combination therapy, acne severity assessment, Global Acne Grading System, antibiotic resistance prevention, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Acne Vulgaris, Adolescent, Adult, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Benzoyl Peroxide, Dermatologic Agents, Erythromycin, Gallic Acid, Gels, Humans, Lauric Acids, Niacinamide, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A retrospective assessment and comparison of the effectiveness of benzoyl peroxide; the combination of topical niacinamide, gallic acid, and lauric acid; and the combination of benzoyl peroxide and erythromycin in acne vulgaris. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/dth.13534
The paper
Kozan, A., Guner, R. Y., & Akyol, M. (2020). A retrospective assessment and comparison of the effectiveness of benzoyl peroxide; the combination of topical niacinamide, gallic acid, and lauric acid; and the combination of benzoyl peroxide and erythromycin in acne vulgaris. Dermatologic Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.13534