Cited by 25Nursing care and researchCancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic Care

Effect of nursing care given at home on the quality of life of patients with stomach cancer and their family caregivers’ nursing care

Open access
Bilgin, S., Gozum, S.·2018·European Journal of Cancer Care

Abstract

In Turkey, the high incidences of stomach and oesophageal cancers in East and high incidence of stomach cancer in Northeast regions are remarkable. This study was conducted to identify homecare needs of patients with stomach cancer and their caregivers and the effect of family supportive nursing care on the quality of life of patients and families. The patient and his/her caregiver were assessed with respect to their daily life activities and NANDA was used for the identified nursing diagnoses, NIC for the appropriate interventions and NOC for assessment of the results. This study was conducted in a pre-test, post-test, controlled trial model to identify. The sample of the investigation consisted of 72 patients and 72 caregivers. As a data-collecting instrument, the Quality of Life Scale and Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer were used. The overall quality of life, global health status and emotional and cognitive functions of the patients in the experimental group improved after the interventions. The overall quality of life and global health status was found to be poorer in the control group patients at post-test as compared to pre-test and their physical, role and social functions deteriorated. The caregivers' quality of life in the control group was affected more negatively with respect to the "Disruption in Daily Life" subscale as compared to pre-test values.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ecc.12567

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ten studies did not describe average age.

    “However, it must be highlighted that 10 studies did not describe average age [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31].”

    From Quality of Life in Caregivers of Cancer Patients: A Literature Review (2023) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Results report mean ages in Table 1 for patients and Table 2 for family caregivers, contrary to the claim that this cited study did not describe average age. Page numbers are not available in the supplied passages. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • 10 studies described financial problems of caregivers, resulting from costs associated with the disease, lack of financial support of other family members, or difficulty reconciling role as caregivers with work activity.

    “In the economic sphere, 10 studies [25,27,39,44,53,56,57] described the financial problems of people caregivers, resulting from the costs associated with the disease, the lack of financial support of other family members, or the difficulty of reconciling their role as caregivers with their work activity.”

    From Quality of Life in Caregivers of Cancer Patients: A Literature Review (2023) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Discussion reports caregivers’ financial concerns and says economic problems remained unresolved after home nursing care; the Conclusion likewise says their financial concerns continued. The paper does not identify disease-related costs, lack of financial support from family, or difficulty combining caregiving with work as causes. The count of 10 studies belongs to the citing paper’s synthesis, not to this individual source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • 15 studies described caregivers as mostly spouses or daughters/sons of patients with cancer, usually sharing the same home.

    “As for family bonds, 15 studies described these caregivers as being mostly spouses or daughters/sons of the patients with cancer, usually sharing the same home [22,23,25,26,27,28,30,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39].”

    From Quality of Life in Caregivers of Cancer Patients: A Literature Review (2023) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Results (Table 2; page unavailable) show that nearly all caregivers in this study were spouses, children, or other close relatives of patients with stomach cancer. The paper does not establish that they usually shared the patient's home, and this single study cannot substantiate the citing sentence's count of 15 studies. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • 10 studies described how the patients' disease process has affected the social interaction of caregivers, who manifest great difficulty in reconciling their role as caregivers and the development of other daily activities, highlighting deterioration of working conditions.

    “With regard to social aspects, 10 studies [24,25,27,31,32,41,49,53,54,55] described how the patients’ disease process has affected the social interaction of caregivers, who manifest a great difficulty in reconciling their role as caregivers and the development of other daily activities, highlighting the deterioration of working conditions.”

    From Quality of Life in Caregivers of Cancer Patients: A Literature Review (2023) · cites this paper as [27]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Care provision by caregivers of adults with cancer causes social problems, including difficulty reconciling caregiving with other activities, deterioration of working conditions, and less social event engagement.

    “Regarding social problems, review studies [24,25,27,31,32,41,49,53,54,55] described how social interactions of caregivers were affected to the point of finding it very difficult to reconcile their role of caregivers with the rest of activities, where deterioration of working conditions and lesser social event engagement were highlighted.”

    From Quality of Life in Caregivers of Cancer Patients: A Literature Review (2023) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports hardship in the caregiver role, impaired social interaction, and disruption in daily life among family caregivers of patients with stomach cancer. These findings support the claim about difficulty balancing caregiving with other activities, but the paper does not report deteriorating working conditions or reduced attendance at social events. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Akcay, D. (2005). Impact of education on chemotherapy side effects and homecare on Quality of Life in chemotherapy receiving patients with breast cancer. Master's thesis, Ataturk University Health Sciences Faculty, Erzurum.
  2. Arslan, O. (2003) Assessment of chemotherapy-related symptoms in patients with cancer and the role of nursing education in controlling these symptoms. Doctoral thesis, Gata Health Sciences Institute Nursing High School, Ankara.
  3. Atesci, F. C., Oguzhanoglu, N. K., Baltalarli-Karadag, F., Ozdel, O., & Karagoz, N. (2003). Psychiatric disorders in cancer patients and related factors. Turkish Psychiatry Journal, 14, 145-152.
  4. Beser, N., & Oz, F. (2003). Anxiety-depression and quality of life in patients with lymphoma who receive chemotherapy. Cumhuriyet University. News Health Service Journal, 7, 47-58.
  5. Dedeli, O., Fadiloglu, Ç., & Uslu, R. (2008). Investigation of functioning and perceived social support in patients with cancer. Turkish Oncology Journal, 23, 132-139.
  6. Ertem, G. (2010). Homecare in gynecologic cancers. Turkish Oncology Journal, 25, 124-132.
  7. Ertem, G., Kalkim, A., Bulut, S., & Sevil, U. (2009). Homecare needs and quality of life of patients receiving radiotherapy. Maltepe University, Nursing Science and Art Journal, 2, 4-12.
  8. Eser, S., Yakut, C., Özdemir, R., Karakilinç, H., Özalan, S., Marshall, S. F., … & Tuncer, M. (2010). Cancer incidence rates in Turkey in 2006: A detailed registry based estimation. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 11, 1731-1739.
  9. Giarelli, E., Pisano, R., & McCorkle, R. (2000). Stable & able. A standardized nursing intervention protocol for patients with cancer redefines the relationship among patients, caretakers, and nurses. American Journal of Nursing, 100, 26-31.
  10. Godino, C., Jodar, L., Duran, A., & Martinez, I. (2006). Nursing education as an intervention to decrease fatigue perception in oncology patients. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 10, 150-155.
  11. Gorgulu, U., & Akdemir, N. (2010). Assessment of fatigue and sleep quality in caregivers of patients with advanced stage cancer. General Medical Journal, 20, 125-132.
  12. Hacialioglu, N., Ozer, N., Yilmaz Karabulutlu, E., Erdem, N., & Erci, B. (2010). The quality of life of family caregivers of cancer patients in the East of Turkey. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 14, 211-217.
  13. Kav, S. (2003). Effect of home visits on quality of life and self-care in patients receiving chemotherapy. Doctoral thesis, Hacettepe University, Institute of Health Sciences, Ankara.
  14. Ozer, K. (2008) Analysis of prognostic factors affecting postoperative sur- vival in patients with stomach cancer. Specialization thesis, Istanbul. Available from: http://www.istanbulsaglik.gov.tr/w/tez/pdf/genel_cer- rahi/dr_kadir_ozer.pdf (accessed 26 may 2011).
  15. Ozkan, S. (2001). Family problems in cancer care. Proceedings Book of the National Cancer Congress, 96pp. Istanbul.
  16. Sun-Kapucu, S., & Akdemir, N. (2007). Effect of home visits on quality of life and self-care in patients receiving chemotherapy. Hacettepe University Nursing Science and Art Journal, 14, 9-22.
  17. Turkoglu, N. (2010) Effect of caregiving burden on Quality of Life in fam- ily members giving care to cancer patients. Master's thesis, Ataturk University Health Sciences Institute, Erzurum.
  18. Unsar, S., Findik, U. Y., Kurt, S., & Ozcan, H. (2007). Homecare and symptom control in cancer patients. Firat Health Services Journal, 2, 131-145.
  19. Yarbro, C. H., Frogge, H. M., Goodman, M., & Groenwald, S. L. (Eds.) (2006). Cancer nursing principles and practice (5th edn, pp. 352-486). London: Jones and Barlett.
  20. Yesilbakan Usta, O., Akyol Durmaz, A., Çetinkaya, Y., Altın, T., & Unlu, D. (2005). Investigation of treatment-related symptoms in patients receiving chemotherapy and effect of these on their quality of life. Ege University News Health Service Journal, 21, 13-31.
  21. Yeter, K. (2006). Effect of education given to patients receiving chemo- therapy on their Quality of Life. Master's thesis, Osmangazi University Health Sciences Institute, Eskisehir.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Quality of Life in Caregivers of Cancer Patients: A Literature Review

    Guerra-Martín, M. D., Casado-Espinosa, M. D. R., Gavira-López, Y., Holgado-Castro, C., López-Latorre, I., & Borrallo-Riego, Á. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20021570 · Cited by 80 · see citing works

    “Bilgin y Gozum, 2018 [27] Identify the needs of nursing care given at home of both patients with stomach cancer and their caregivers, as well as the effect of family nursing care in the quality of life of both patients and their families.”
    BackgroundInfluential

Authors
Bilgin, S., & Gozum, S.
Affiliations
  • Atatürk University (TR)
  • Department of Public Health Nursing; Akdeniz University Faculty of Nursing; Antalya Turkey
Corresponding author
Bilgin, S.
Venue
European Journal of Cancer Care
Published
2016-12-22
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
e12567
ISSN
0961-5423 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2564811468
Cited by
25
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Cancer Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Oncology Unit of Ataturk University Research Hospital
  • Chemotherapy Unit of Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
gastric cancer, home care, family caregivers, quality of life, supportive nursing care, caregiver burden, nursing diagnosis, activities of daily living, caregiver quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Family, Female, Health Status, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Social Support, Stomach Neoplasms, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review