Cited by 28Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeSarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer survivorship and care

Quality of life after bone sarcoma surgery around the knee: A long-term follow-up study

Open access
Bekkering, W.P., van Egmond-van Dam, J.C., Bramer, J.A.M., Beishuizen, A., Fiocco, M., Dijkstra, P.D.S.·2017·European Journal of Cancer Care

Abstract

It remains unclear if quality of life (QoL) improvements could be expected in young patients after malignant bone tumour surgery after 2 years. To assess the course of QoL over time during a long-term follow-up, malignant bone tumour survivors of a previous short-term study were included. Assessments were done at least 5 years after surgery. QoL was measured with Short-form (SF)-36, TNO-AZL Questionnaire for Adult's Quality of Life (TAAQOL) and Bone tumour (Bt)-DUX. QoL throughout the follow-up was analysed by linear mixed model analysis. From the original cohort of 44 patients; 20 patients were included for this study, 10 males; mean age at surgery 15.1 years and mean follow-up 7.2 years. Twenty-one patients of the initial cohort (47%) deceased. Fifteen patients (75%) underwent limb-salvage and five (25%) ablative surgery. QoL improved significantly during follow-up at Physical Component Summary Scale scale of the SF-36 and TAAQOL and all subscales of the Bt-DUX (p < .01). No significant differences were found between current evaluations and previous evaluations at 2 years after surgery (p = .41-.98). Significant advantages after limb-salvage were seen at the PCS scale of the SF-36 (MD 13.7, p = .05) and the cosmetic scale of the Bt-DUX (MD 17.7, p = .04).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ecc.12603

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A cross-sectional Dutch study compared the HRQoL of patients who underwent resection of a malignant bone tumour from the lower extremity with that of healthy controls.

    “A cross-sectional Dutch study compared the HRQoL of patients who underwent resection of a malignant bone tumour from the lower extremity with that of healthy controls 179 .”

    From Osteosarcoma (2022) · cites this paper as [179]

  • Patients who had undergone surgery had lower scores for motor function, cognitive function, pain and general health.

    “Patients who had undergone surgery had lower scores for motor function, cognitive function, pain and general health.”

    From Osteosarcoma (2022) · cites this paper as [179]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Veenstra, K. M., Sprangers, M. A., van der Eyken, J. W., & Taminiau, A. H. (2000). Quality of life in survivors with a Van Ness-Borggreve rotationplasty after bone tumour resection. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 73, 192-197.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bekkering, W. P., van Egmond-van Dam, J. C., Bramer, J. A. M., Beishuizen, A., Fiocco, M., & Dijkstra, P. D. S.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy; Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital; Leiden University Medical Centre; Leiden The Netherlands
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Bekkering, W.P.
Venue
European Journal of Cancer Care
Published
2016-11-07
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
e12603
ISSN
0961-5423 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2556478845
Cited by
28
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Cancer Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Johanna Children Fund (2003/0111-161)
  • Children Fund Adrian Foundation (2003/0111)
  • BIO-Children Rehabilitation Fund (2003/0131-161)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
bone sarcoma, quality of life, knee joint, limb salvage, amputation, long-term follow-up, SF-36, physical function, cosmetic outcome, adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Bone Neoplasms, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Knee Joint, Long-Term Care, Male, Quality of Life, Osteosarcoma, Salvage Therapy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review