Cited by 11Nursing care and researchCancer survivorship and careFamily Support in Illness

Influence of time lapse after cancer diagnosis on the association between unmet needs and quality of life in family caregivers of Korean cancer patients

Open access
Shin, Jinyoung, Ko, Hyeonyoung, Lee, Jeong‐Won, Kim, Kihyun, Song, Yun‐Mi·2019·European Journal of Cancer Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study explored the association between healthcare needs and quality of life (QoL) of Korean cancer family caregivers according to the time lapse after cancer diagnosis. METHODS: Self-administered comprehensive needs assessment tool and EuroQol-5-dimension index for 686 cancer family caregivers were classified into four groups according to time lapse after cancer diagnosis (≤12, 13-36, 37-60,>60 months). We estimated the association between unmet needs and QoL by multiple linear regression analyses after adjusting for age, sex, cancer site and caregivers' comorbid conditions. RESULTS: Female or elder caregivers had lower QoL and higher unmet needs. The highest unmet needs existed in healthcare staff domain followed by information/education domain persistently along all periods. QoL of caregivers was significantly associated with family/social support and health/psychological problem during the time lapse of ≤12 months as well as >60 months. Practical support was consistently associated with QoL across all time lapses. Religious/spiritual support and hospital facilities and services showed significant association with QoL only in ≤12 months and >60 months respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The QoL of Korean cancer family caregivers was differentially associated with their unmet needs according to the time lapse after cancer diagnosis and by specific domains of needs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ecc.13089

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Eight studies described that care work implies a greater risk for caregivers of suffering physical morbidity with considerable wear, which increases as care burden continues over time.

    “In relation to physical problems, eight studies [25,34,37,40,41,42,43,44] described that care work implies a greater risk for caregivers of suffering physical morbidity with considerable wear, which in fact increases as the care burden continues over time.”

    From Quality of Life in Caregivers of Cancer Patients: A Literature Review (2023) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that cancer caregiving stress can exacerbate chronic conditions and affect caregivers’ physical health. It also describes increasing physical depletion over time, but only as one of two competing models; the study found no difference in caregivers’ quality of life by time since diagnosis. The claim presents worsening over time more definitively than this source supports. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Earle, C. C. (2007). Long term care planning for cancer survivors: A health services research agenda. Journal of Cancer Survivorship : Research and Practice, 1, 64-74.
  2. Kim, H., & Yi, M. (2015). Unmet needs and quality of life of family caregiv- ers of cancer patients in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing, 2, 152-159.
  3. Kim, Y., Baker, F., & Spillers, R. L. (2007). Cancer caregivers' quality of life: Effects of gender, relationship, and appraisal. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 34, 294-304.
  4. Kitrungroter, L., & Cohen, M. Z. (2006). Quality of life of family caregivers of patients with cancer: A literature review. Oncology Nursing Forum, 33, 625-632.
  5. Kurtz, M. E., Kurtz, J. C., Given, C. W., & Given, B. A. (2004). Depression and physical health among family caregivers of geriatric patients with cancer-a longitudinal view. Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research, 10, Cr447-456.
  6. Lee, H. J., Park, E. C., Kim, S. J., & Lee, S. G. (2015). Quality of Life of Family Members Living with Cancer Patients. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP, 16, 6913-6917.
  7. Li, T. C., Lee, Y. D., Lin, C. C., & Amidon, R. L. (2004). Quality of life of pri- mary caregivers of elderly with cerebrovascular disease or diabetes hospitalized for acute care: Assessment of well-being and functioning using the SF-36 health questionnaire. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 13, 1081-1088.
  8. Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias: Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. In Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  9. Rabin, R., & De Charro, F. (2001). EQ-5D: A measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Annals of Medicine, 33, 337-343.
  10. Rha, S. Y., Park, Y., Song, S. K., Lee, C. E., & Lee, J. (2015). Caregiving bur- den and the quality of life of family caregivers of cancer patients: The relationship and correlates. European Journal of Oncology Nursing : The Official Journal of European Oncology Nursing Society, 19, 376-382.
  11. Shahi, V., Lapid, M. I., Kung, S., Atherton, P. J., Sloan, J. A., Clark, M. M., & Rummans, T. A. (2014). Do age and quality of life of patients with cancer influence quality of life of the caregiver? Journal of Geriatric Oncology, 5, 331-336.
  12. Shin, D. W., Sunwoo, S., & Lee, J. (2015). Management of cancer survi- vors in Korea. Journal of the Korean Medical Association, 58, 216.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shin, J., Ko, H., Lee, J., Kim, K., & Song, Y.
Affiliations
  • Konkuk University (KR)
  • Kangbuk Samsung Hospital (KR)
  • Samsung Medical Center (KR)
  • Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Medicine Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Korea
Corresponding author
Song, Yun‐Mi
Venue
European Journal of Cancer Care
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-05-14
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
e13089-e13089
ISSN
  • 0961-5423 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2354
OpenAlex
W2945443325
Cited by
11
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Cancer Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
unmet needs, quality of life, time since cancer diagnosis, health care needs assessment, social support, practical support
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Time Factors, Caregivers, Needs Assessment, Republic of Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review