Cited by 68Cancer survivorship and careNursing care and researchGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Quality of life of family caregivers 8 years after a relative's cancer diagnosis: follow‐up of the National Quality of Life Survey for Caregivers

Kim, Youngmee, Shaffer, Kelly M., Carver, Charles S., Cannady, Rachel S.·2016·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Background: The long‐term impact of cancer caregiving on the family caregivers' quality of life (QOL) is currently not known. This study aimed (a) to characterize family caregivers of cancer survivors at 8 years post‐diagnosis in terms of multidimensional aspects of QOL and (b) to identify demographic and early caregiving experience characteristics that may play significant roles in predicting the caregivers' longer‐term QOL. Methods: A total of 1087 caregivers participated in the 8‐year follow‐up National Quality of Life Survey for Caregivers. Demographics and early caregiving experiences were measured 2 years post‐diagnosis of their relative's cancer. Multidimensional aspects of QOL were assessed, including mental and physical health, psychological adjustment, and spirituality at both 2‐year and 8‐year post‐diagnosis. Results: Approximately 90% of family caregivers ceased the caregiver role by 8 years. One‐fourth of them were due to bereavement. Caregivers' demographic and early caregiving characteristics were significantly associated with QOL. In addition, being bereaved by the 8‐year mark predicted poorer mental health and greater psychological distress independent of contributions of demographic and early caregiving characteristics. Conclusions: Findings provided the first evidence that 8 years after the initial cancer diagnosis in the family, family members who became bereaved suffer from poorer mental health and greater psychological distress. Findings have theoretical implications for better understanding bereavement to cancer and practical implications for developing integrative programs to improve QOL among family members in the various phases of caregivership. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.3843

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, Y., Shaffer, K. M., Carver, C. S., & Cannady, R. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • American Cancer Society (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Youngmee
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-05-15
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
266-274
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2318485928
Cited by
68
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Cancer Society (121909-RSG-12-042-01-CPPB)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
family caregivers, cancer caregiving, quality of life, bereavement, psychological distress, mental health, cancer survivors
MeSH terms
Adult, Bereavement, Family, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Grief, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Caregivers, Survivors, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review