Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 125 of the 125 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Ras/MAPK pathway and hepatocarcinoma: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications

Delire, Bénédicte, Stärkel, Peter·2015·European Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still a major health problem, often diagnosed at an advanced stage. The multikinase inhibitor sorafenib is to date the sole approved systemic therapy. Several signalling pathways are implicated in tumour development and progression. Among these pathways, the Ras/MAPK pathway is activated in 50–100% of human HCC s and is correlated with a poor prognosis. The aim of this work was to review the main intracellular mechanisms leading to aberrant Ras pathway activation in HCC and the potential therapeutic implications. Materials and methods: This review is based on the material found on PubMed up to December 2014. ‘Ras signaling, Ras dysregulation, Ras inhibition, MAPK pathway, cancer, hepatocarcinoma and liver cancer’ alone or in combination were the main terms used for online research. Results: Multiple mechanisms lead to the deregulation of the Ras pathway in liver cancer. Ras and Raf gene mutations are rare events in human hepatocarcinogenesis in contrast to experimental models in rodents. Downregulation of several Ras/MAPK pathway inhibitors such as GAP s, RASSF proteins, DUSP 1, Sprouty and Spred proteins is largely implicated in the aberrant activation of this pathway in the context of wild‐type Ras and Raf genes. Epigenetic or post‐transcriptional mechanisms lead to the downregulation of these tumour suppressor genes. Conclusion: Ras/MAPK pathway effectors may be considered as potential therapeutic targets in the field of HCC. In particular after the arrival of sorafenib, more Ras/MAPK inhibitors have emerged and are still in preclinical or clinical investigation for HCC therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/eci.12441

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 125 references

Cited by

See all 275

Metadata

Authors
Delire, B., & Stärkel, P.
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Investigation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-05-11
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
609-623
ISSN
  • 0014-2972 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2362
OpenAlex
W1997769423
Cited by
275
References
125
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Ras/MAPK pathway and hepatocarcinoma: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/eci.12441
The paper
Delire, B., & Stärkel, P. (2015). The Ras/MAPK pathway and hepatocarcinoma: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12441

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.