Characteristics of gestational diabetes subtypes classified by oral glucose tolerance test values
Open accessAbstract
Background: In clinical practice, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is treated as a homogenous disease but emerging evidence suggests that the diagnosis of GDM possibly comprises different metabolic entities. In this study, we aimed to assess early pregnancy characteristics of gestational diabetes mellitus entities classified according to the presence of fasting and/or post‐load hyperglycaemia in the diagnostic oral glucose tolerance test performed at mid‐gestation. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 1087 pregnant women received a broad risk evaluation and laboratory examination at early gestation and were later classified as normal glucose tolerant (NGT), as having isolated fasting hyperglycaemia (GDM‐IFH), isolated post‐load hyperglycaemia (GDM‐IPH) or combined hyperglycaemia (GDM‐CH) according to oral glucose tolerance test results. Participants were followed up until delivery to assess data on pharmacotherapy and pregnancy outcomes. Results: Women affected by elevated fasting and post‐load glucose concentrations (GDM‐CH) showed adverse metabolic profiles already at beginning of pregnancy including a higher degree of insulin resistance as compared to women with normal glucose tolerance and those with isolated defects (especially GDM‐IPH). The GDM‐IPH subgroup had lower body mass index at early gestation and required glucose‐lowering medications less often (28.9%) as compared to GDM‐IFH (47.8%, P = .019) and GDM‐CH (54.5%, P = .005). No differences were observed in pregnancy outcome data. Conclusions: Women with fasting hyperglycaemia, especially those with combined hyperglycaemia, showed an unfavourable metabolic phenotype already at early gestation. Therefore, categorization based on abnormal oral glucose tolerance test values provides a practicable basis for clinical risk stratification.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Austria, Kotzaeridi et al. reported GDM incidence of 17.8%.
“Similar results were presented by Kotzaeridi et al., with an incidence of GDM at 17.8% [136].”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [136]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Matthews, D. R., Hosker, J. P., Rudenski, A. S., Naylor, B. A., Treacher, D. F., & Turner, R. C. (1985) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/bf00280883 · Cited by 31,502 · see citing works
Katz, A., Nambi, S. S., Mather, K., Baron, A. D., Follmann, D. A., Sullivan, G., & Quon, M. J. (2000) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.85.7.6661 · Cited by 3,831 · see citing works
A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research
Simera, I., Moher, D., Hoey, J., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · European Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02234.x · Cited by 1,047 · see citing works
Abdul-Ghani, M. A., Tripathy, D., & DeFronzo, R. A. (2006) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc05-2179 · Cited by 744 · see citing works
Wexler, D. J., Powe, C. E., Barbour, L. A., Buchanan, T., Coustan, D. R., Corcoy, R., Damm, P., Dunne, F., Feig, D. S., Ferrara, A., et al. (2018) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002726 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- [2]Powe CE, Allard C, Battista M‐C, et al. Heterogeneous contribution of insulin sensitivity and secretion defects to gestational diabetes mellitus: Table 1. Diabetes Care. 2016; 39(6): 1052‐ 1055. 10.2337/dc15-2672 27208340 PMC4878218 · DOI
- [3]International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33(3): 676‐ 682. 10.2337/dc09-1848 20190296 PMC2827530 · DOI · Paper page
- [4]World Health Organisation. Diagnostic Criteria and Classification of Hyperglycaemia First Detected in Pregnancy; 2013. http://www.who.int/diabetes/publications/Hyperglycaemia_In_Pregnancy/en/ 24199271
- [6]Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Chute CG, Litin LB, Willett WC. Validity of self‐reported waist and hip circumferences in men and women. Epidemiology. 1990; 1(6): 466‐ 473. 10.1097/00001648-199011000-00009 2090285 · DOI · Paper page
- [7]Zhang C, Tobias DK, Chavarro JE, et al. Adherence to healthy lifestyle and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2014; 349: g5450. 25269649 PMC4180295
- [8]Schäfer‐Graf U, Gembruch U, Kainer F, et al. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) – diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up. Guideline of the DDG and DGGG (S3 Level, AWMF Registry Number 057/008, February 2018). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2018; 78(12): 1219‐ 1231. 10.1055/a-0659-2596 30651660 PMC6301211 · DOI
- [9]Kautzky‐Willer A, Harreiter J, Winhofer‐Stöckl Y, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus (Update 2019). Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2019; 131(Suppl 1): 91‐ 102. 10.1007/s00508-018-1419-8 30980150 · DOI
- [10]American Diabetes Association. 14. Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020. Diabetes Care. 2020; 43(Suppl. 1): S183‐ S192. 10.2337/dc20-S014 31862757 · DOI
- [12]Villar J, Ismail LC, Victora CG, et al. International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross‐Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH‐21st Project. Lancet. 2014; 384(9946): 857‐ 868. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60932-6 25209487 · DOI · Paper page
- [16]Tura A, Kautzky‐Willer A, Pacini G. Insulinogenic indices from insulin and C‐peptide: comparison of beta‐cell function from OGTT and IVGTT. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2006; 72(3): 298‐ 301. 10.1016/j.diabres.2005.10.005 16325298 · DOI
- [17]Utzschneider KM, Prigeon RL, Faulenbach MV, et al. Oral disposition index predicts the development of future diabetes above and beyond fasting and 2‐h glucose levels. Diabetes Care. 2009; 32(2): 335‐ 341. 10.2337/dc08-1478 18957530 PMC2628704 · DOI · Paper page
- [18]Tura A, Sbrignadello S, Succurro E, Groop L, Sesti G, Pacini G. An empirical index of insulin sensitivity from short IVGTT: validation against the minimal model and glucose clamp indices in patients with different clinical characteristics. Diabetologia. 2010; 53(1): 144‐ 152. 10.1007/s00125-009-1547-9 19876614 · DOI · Paper page
- [20]Liu Y, Hou W, Meng X, et al. Heterogeneity of insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction in gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study of perinatal outcomes. J Transl Med. 2018; 16(1): 289. 10.1186/s12967-018-1666-5 30355279 PMC6201515 · DOI
- [21]Benhalima K, Van Crombrugge P, Moyson C, et al. Characteristics and pregnancy outcomes across gestational diabetes mellitus subtypes based on insulin resistance. Diabetologia. 2019; 62(11): 2118‐ 2128. 10.1007/s00125-019-4961-7 31338546 · DOI
- [22]Yerlikaya G, Falcone V, Stopp T, et al. To predict the requirement of pharmacotherapy by OGTT glucose levels in women with GDM classified by the IADPSG criteria. J Diabetes Res. 2018; 2018: 3243754. 10.1155/2018/3243754 29854820 PMC5964564 · DOI
- [23]Uvena‐Celebrezze J, Fung C, Thomas AJ, et al. Relationship of neonatal body composition to maternal glucose control in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002; 12(6): 396‐ 401. 10.1080/jmf.12.6.396.401 12683650 · DOI
- [24]Farrar D, Fairley L, Santorelli G, et al. Association between hyperglycaemia and adverse perinatal outcomes in south Asian and white British women: analysis of data from the Born in Bradford cohort. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015; 3(10): 795‐ 804. 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00255-7 26355010 PMC4673084 · DOI
- [25]Black MH, Sacks DA, Xiang AH, Lawrence JM. Clinical outcomes of pregnancies complicated by mild gestational diabetes mellitus differ by combinations of abnormal oral glucose tolerance test values. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33(12): 2524‐ 2530. 10.2337/dc10-1445 20843973 PMC2992182 · DOI
- [26]Farrar D, Simmonds M, Bryant M, et al. Hyperglycaemia and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMJ. Published online September 13, 2016; 354: i4694. 10.1136/bmj.i4694 27624087 PMC5021824 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century
Dłuski, D. F., Ruszała, M., Rudziński, G., Pożarowska, K., Brzuszkiewicz, K., & Leszczyńska-Gorzelak, B. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192315804 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kotzaeridi, G., Blätter, J., Eppel, D., Rosicky, I., Linder, T., Geissler, F., Huhn, E. A., Hösli, I., Tura, A., & Göbl, C. S.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of Vienna (AT)
- University Hospital of Basel (CH)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland
- National Research Council (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Göbl, Christian S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-06-13
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e13628-e13628
- ISSN
- 0014-2972 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2362
- PMC
- PMC8459269
- OpenAlex
- W3171220292
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 6.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- European Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Universität Wien
- Medizinische Universität Wien
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, oral glucose tolerance test, insulin resistance, glucose-lowering medications, pregnancy outcomes, risk stratification
- MeSH terms
- Pregnancy in Obesity, Obesity, Maternal, Adult, Austria, Blood Glucose, Cesarean Section, Fasting, Female, Fetal Macrosomia, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin Resistance, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical, Cohort Studies, Body Mass Index, Diabetes, Gestational, Risk Assessment, Premature Birth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review