The DOI matches its Crossref record; 187 of the 187 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution of dispersal strategies and dispersal syndromes in fragmented landscapes
Open accessAbstract
Habitat fragmentation, an important element of current global change, has profound repercussions on population and species extinction. Landscape fragmentation reduces individual movements between patches (i.e. dispersal) while such movements connecting patches enhance the persistence of metapopulations and metacommunities. Through the recognition of non‐random movements, dispersal has recently been recognized as a highly complex process. This complexity likely changes the predictions on the evolution of dispersal in spatially structured populations and communities. In this article, we emphasize the effects of fragmentation on the evolution of non‐random dispersal. Habitat fragmentation may shape local and global selective pressures acting on a large array of phenotypic traits known to covary with dispersal behaviors. On top of changes in dispersal propensity, habitat fragmentation could therefore modify dispersal syndromes (i.e. dispersers' phenotypic specializations). Habitat fragmentation often leads to spatial structuring of local conditions and consequently may lead to the evolution of different dispersal syndromes at the landscape scale. By neglecting impacts on dispersal syndromes, we might underestimate the impacts of fragmentation on a crucial biodiversity level for metapopulation and metacommunity functioning. We highlight a set of priorities for future empirical and theoretical work that together would provide the understanding of eco‐evolutionary dynamics of dispersal syndromes required for improving our ability to predict and manage spatially structured populations and communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Consequences of Land Use
Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., Gibbs, H. K., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1111772 · Cited by 13,272
Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges
Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A. H., Gessner, M. O., Kawabata, Z., Knowler, D. J., Lévêque, C., Naiman, R. J., Prieur‐Richard, A., Soto, D., Stiassny, M. L. J., et al. (2006) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793105006950 · Cited by 8,489
Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity
Fahrig, L. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419 · Cited by 7,879
Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems
Haddad, N. M., Brudvig, L. A., Clobert, J., Davies, K. F., Gonzalez, A., Holt, R. D., Lovejoy, T. E., Sexton, J. O., Austin, M. P., Collins, C. D., et al. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500052 · Cited by 4,773
Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity
Newbold, T., Hudson, L. N., Hill, S. L. L., Contu, S., Lysenko, I., Senior, R. A., Börger, L., Bennett, D. J., Choimes, A., Collen, B., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14324 · Cited by 4,352
Krause, J., & Ruxton, G. D. (2002) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198508175.001.0001 · Cited by 3,189
Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation
Murcia, C. (1995) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(00)88977-6 · Cited by 3,006
Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology
Koolhaas, J. M., Korte, S. M., De Boer, S. F., Van Der Vegt, B. J., Van Reenen, C. G., Hopster, H., De Jong, I. C., Ruis, M. A. W., & Blokhuis, H. J. (1999) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(99)00026-3 · Cited by 2,999
Bowler, D. E., & Benton, T. G. (2005) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793104006645 · Cited by 1,904
Gene flow and the limits to natural selection
Lenormand, T. (2002) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02497-7 · Cited by 1,871
Cited by
Bocedi, G., Palmer, S. C. F., Malchow, A., Zurell, D., Watts, K., & Travis, J. M. J. (2021) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.05687 · Cited by 87
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cote, J., Bestion, E., Jacob, S., Travis, J., Legrand, D., & Baguette, M.
- Venue
- Ecography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-12-14
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-73
- ISSN
- 0906-7590 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0587
- OpenAlex
- W2547569465
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 187
- FWCI
- 23.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of dispersal strategies and dispersal syndromes in fragmented landscapes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ecog.02538
- The paper
- Cote, J., Bestion, E., Jacob, S., Travis, J., Legrand, D., & Baguette, M. (2017). Evolution of dispersal strategies and dispersal syndromes in fragmented landscapes. Ecography. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02538
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.