The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is Internet Job Search Still Ineffective?
Abstract
Using National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY97) data for 2005–8, we find that unemployed persons who look for work online are re‐employed about 25% faster than comparable workers who do not search online. This finding contrasts with previous results for 1998–2001, and is robust to controls for cognitive test scores and detailed indicators of Internet access. Internet job search (IJS) appears to be most effective in reducing unemployment durations when used to contact friends and relatives, to send out resumes or fill out applications and also to look at advertisements. We detect a weak positive relationship between IJS and wage growth between jobs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Economic duration data and hazard functions
Kiefer, N. M. (1988) · Journal of Economic Literature · Cited by 1,845
Does the Internet Make Markets More Competitive? Evidence from the Life Insurance Industry
Brown, J. R., & Goolsbee, A. (2002) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/339714 · Cited by 838
Autor, D. H. (2001) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.15.1.25 · Cited by 436
Search Method Use by Unemployed Youth
Holzer, H. J. (1988) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/298172 · Cited by 402
Job Search Outcomes for the Employed and Unemployed
Blau, D. M., & Robins, P. K. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261698 · Cited by 388
Internet Job Search and Unemployment Durations
Kuhn, P., & Skuterud, M. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282804322970779 · Cited by 364
Self-citationBridging the digital divide: technology, community, and public policy
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-6100 · Cited by 347
Search Method Use by Unemployed Youth
Holzer, H. (1986) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w1859 · Cited by 334
Fairlie, R. W. (2004) · Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy · doi:10.2202/1538-0645.1263 · Cited by 242
Kroft, K., & Pope, D. G. (2014) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/673374 · Cited by 228
Cited by
Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2019) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20171452 · Cited by 2,744
The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online?
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2015) · Communication and Information Technologies Annual · doi:10.1108/s2050-206020150000010002 · Cited by 1,022
The Value of Postsecondary Credentials in the Labor Market: An Experimental Study
Deming, D. J., Yuchtman, N., Abulafi, A., Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2016) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20141757 · Cited by 278
The Effects of Algorithmic Labor Market Recommendations: Evidence from a Field Experiment
Horton, J. J. (2017) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/689213 · Cited by 203
Calvo, F., & Carbonell, X. (2018) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.9814 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuhn, P., & Mansour, H.
- Venue
- The Economic Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-04-04
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 581
- Pages
- 1213-1233
- ISSN
- 0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2242319855
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 34.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is Internet Job Search Still Ineffective? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ecoj.12119
- The paper
- Kuhn, P., & Mansour, H. (2014). Is Internet Job Search Still Ineffective? The Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12119
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.