The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Race and the Digital Divide
Abstract
In recent years, a plethora of public and private programs in the United States have been created to close the "Digital Divide." Interestingly, however, we know very little about the underlying causes of racial differences in rates of computer and Internet access. In this paper, I use data from the Computer and Internet Use Supplement to the August 2000 Current Population Survey (CPS) to explore this question. Estimates from the CPS indicate that Mexican-Americans are roughly one-half as likely to own a computer and one-third as likely to have Internet access at home as whites. The black home computer rate is 59 percent of the white rate and the black home Internet access rate is 51 percent of the white rate. Using Blinder-Oaxaca decompositions, I find that racial differences in education, income and occupation contribute substantially to the black/white and Mexican-American/white gaps in home computer and Internet access rates. The digital divide between races, however, is not simply an "income divide" as income differences explain only 10 to 30 percent of the gaps in access to technology. I do not find evidence that price or school differences are responsible for the remaining gaps. I find some evidence, however, that language barriers may be important in explaining low rates of computer and Internet access among Mexican-Americans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates
Blinder, A. S. (1973) · The Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.2307/144855 · Cited by 6,922
Cited by
Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5 · Cited by 1,252
Chinn, M. D., & Fairlie, R. W. (2006) · Oxford Economic Papers · doi:10.1093/oep/gpl024 · Cited by 687
Self-citationIs Internet Job Search Still Ineffective?
Kuhn, P., & Mansour, H. (2014) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12119 · Cited by 386
An Extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca Decomposition Technique to Logit and Probit Models
Fairlie, R. W. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.497302 · Cited by 300
Self-citationBulman, G., & Fairlie, R. W. (2016) · Handbook of the Economics of Education · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63459-7.00005-1 · Cited by 284
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fairlie, R. W.
- Venue
- Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2004-09-15
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-38
- ISSN
- 1538-0645 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128259818
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 33.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Race and the Digital Divide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2202/1538-0645.1263
- The paper
- Fairlie, R. W. (2004). Race and the Digital Divide. Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy. https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0645.1263
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.