Cited by 49Economic Growth and ProductivityFirm Innovation and GrowthInnovation Policy and R&D

Innovation, competition and productivity: Firm‐level evidence for Eastern Europe and Central Asia

Friesenbichler, Klaus, Peneder, Michael·2016·Economics of Transition

Abstract

We investigate the drivers of firm‐level productivity in catching‐up economies by jointly estimating its relationship to innovation and competition using data from the EBRD‐WB Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey(BEEPS) in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. The findings confirm an inverted‐U shaped impact of competition on R&D. Both competition and innovation have a simultaneous positive effect on labour productivity in terms of either sales or value added per employee, as does a high share of university graduates and foreign ownership. Further positive impacts come from firm size, exports or population density. Innovation and foreign ownership appear to be the strongest drivers of multifactor productivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ecot.12100

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Populism and nativism - in all their different manifestations in the USA, Europe, or emerging countries - are related inter alia to Rust Belts, industrial regions losing dominant firms, and districts losing their populations through emigration while averse to new migrants.

    “Populism and nativism -in all their different manifestations in the USA, Europe, or emerging countries -are related inter alia to Rust Belts, industrial regions losing dominant firms, and districts losing their populations through emigration while averse to new migrants.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Friesenbichler, K., & Peneder, M.
Affiliations
Austrian Institute of Economic Research (AT)
Corresponding author
  • Friesenbichler, Klaus
  • Peneder, Michael
Venue
Economics of Transition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-05-28
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
535-580
ISSN
  • 0967-0750 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0351
OpenAlex
W2411676796
Cited by
49
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Economics of Transition (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Oesterreichische Nationalbank
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Innovation Policy and R&D
Keywords
firm productivity, innovation, competition, catching-up economies, research and development, labor productivity, total factor productivity, foreign ownership, university graduates, firm size, exports, population density, Eastern Europe, Central Asia, BEEP

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review