The DOI matches its Crossref record; 152 of the 152 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
World traumatic dental injury prevalence and incidence, a meta‐analysis—One billion living people have had traumatic dental injuries
Abstract
Traumatic dental injuries (TDI s) account for a considerable proportion of bodily injuries. Nevertheless, global TDI frequency is unknown, probably because TDI diagnosis is not standardized. This study estimated world TDI frequency. A literature search (publication years 1996‐2016) was aimed at covering as many countries, communities, ethnic groups as possible, thus achieving high generalizability. In particular, non‐specific keywords, no language restrictions, and large databanks were used. Observational studies reporting proportions of individuals with at least one TDI (prevalence) and who developed TDI (incidence rate) were considered. Prevalence rates to permanent dentition, primary dentition and in 12‐year‐olds, incidence rate to any tooth for any age, male‐to‐female prevalence ratio (PR) in 12‐year‐olds, with 95% confidence intervals (95 CI s), were extracted/calculated. Study quality, Z‐score distribution, funnel plot symmetry analysis, between‐study heterogeneity, sensitivity, and subgroup analyses were performed. Selected primary studies were 102 (permanent dentition; 268 755 individuals; median age, 13.8 years), 46 (primary dentition; 59 436 individuals; median age, 3.4 years), 42 (12‐year‐olds; 33 829 individuals), 11 (incidence rate; 233 480 person‐years; median age, 7.8 years), and 31 (PR; 16 003 males, 16 006 females). World TDI frequency resulted as follows: permanent dentition prevalence 15.2% (95 CI, 13.0%‐17.4%); primary dentition prevalence 22.7% (95 CI, 17.3%‐28.7%); 12‐year‐olds prevalence 18.1% (95 CI, 15.3%‐21.0%); incidence rate, 2.82 (95 CI, 2.28%‐3.42%) per 100 person‐years; PR, 1.43 (95 CI, 1.34%‐1.52%). Differences between WHO Regions were found. This study shows that more than one billion living people have had TDI. TDI is a neglected condition which could rank fifth if it was included in the list of the world's most frequent acute/chronic diseases and injuries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
Vos, T., Allen, C., Arora, M., Barber, R. M., Bhutta, Z. A., Brown, A., Carter, A., Casey, D. C., Charlson, F. J., Chen, A. Z., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31678-6 · Cited by 7,253
Hoy, D., Brooks, P., Woolf, A., Blyth, F., March, L., Bain, C., Baker, P., Smith, E., & Buchbinder, R. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.014 · Cited by 2,555
Publication and related bias in meta-analysis
Sterne, J. A. C., Gavaghan, D., & Egger, M. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00242-0 · Cited by 2,282
Barendregt, J. J., Doi, S. A., Lee, Y. Y., Norman, R. E., & Vos, T. (2013) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2013-203104 · Cited by 2,169
Cited by
Disparities in Access to Oral Health Care
Northridge, M. E., Kumar, A., & Kaur, R. (2020) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094318 · Cited by 544
Day, P. F., Flores, M. T., O'Connell, A. C., Abbott, P. V., Tsilingaridis, G., Fouad, A. F., Cohenca, N., Lauridsen, E., Bourguignon, C., Hicks, L., et al. (2020) · Dental Traumatology · doi:10.1111/edt.12576 · Cited by 459
The association of overjet size and traumatic dental injuries—A systematic review and meta-analysis
Arraj, G. P., Rossi‐Fedele, G., & Doğramacı, E. J. (2019) · Dental Traumatology · doi:10.1111/edt.12481 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Petti, S., Glendor, U., & Andersson, L.
- Venue
- Dental Traumatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 71-86
- ISSN
- 1600-4469 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-9657
- OpenAlex
- W2791797632
- Cited by
- 698
- References
- 152
- FWCI
- 60.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: World traumatic dental injury prevalence and incidence, a meta‐analysis—One billion living people have had traumatic dental injuries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/edt.12389
- The paper
- Petti, S., Glendor, U., & Andersson, L. (2018). World traumatic dental injury prevalence and incidence, a meta‐analysis—One billion living people have had traumatic dental injuries. Dental Traumatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12389
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.