Cited by 35Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychology and Mental Health

Spontaneous labelling and stigma associated with clinical characteristics of peers ‘at‐risk’ for psychosis

Open access
Anglin, Deidre M., Greenspoon, Michelle I., Lighty, Quenesha, Corcoran, Cheryl M., Yang, Lawrence H.·2014·Early Intervention in Psychiatry

Abstract

Aim: The public health benefits of utilizing an ‘at‐risk for psychosis’ designation are tempered by concerns about stigma. It is therefore of interest to examine whether symptoms associated with this designation might spontaneously induce labels associated with a psychotic disorder, other non‐psychotic disorders or non‐psychiatric labels. This pilot study explored the labels associated with characteristics of ‘high risk for psychosis’ and the corresponding stigma level. Methods: A vignette describing an identical character, followed by a series of questions about stigmatizing attitudes towards the vignette character, was administered in the present investigation. Results: The results indicated that even though most young people (59%) did not spontaneously label the vignette character with psychotic‐like diagnostic labels, the single most frequent label provided was ‘paranoid/a’. When such labelling, that is, strongly tied to psychosis, occurred, respondents exhibited stronger stigmatizing attributions of fear compared to those indicating non‐psychiatric labels (e.g. ‘weird’). Conclusions: These results suggest that the majority of respondents did not endorse diagnostic labels spontaneously, thus signaling that stigma in the majority of cases would not naturalistically be elicited. However, a segment of respondents evidenced stigma simply from behavioural changes manifested by individuals exhibiting signs of psychosis, independent of diagnosis. Implications for reducing any stigma associated with an ‘at‐risk for psychosis’ designation are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/eip.12047

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anglin, D. M., Greenspoon, M. I., Lighty, Q., Corcoran, C. M., & Yang, L. H.
Affiliations
  • The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
  • Antioch University Santa Barbara (US)
  • City College of New York (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Anglin, Deidre M.
Venue
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-18
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
247-252
ISSN
  • 1751-7885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7893
OpenAlex
W1922915011
Cited by
35
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000040)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH066279, R21MH086125)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
diagnostic labels, paranoid symptoms, stigmatizing attitudes, youth, psychiatric diagnosis, public perception of mental illness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Peer Group, Pilot Projects, Psychotic Disorders, Young Adult, Social Stigma, Prodromal Symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review