Cited by 16Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health services

Detection and characteristics of individuals with a very long duration of untreated psychosis in an early intervention for psychosis service

O'Donoghue, Brian, Lyne, John, Kinsella, Anthony, Turner, Niall, O'Callaghan, Eadbhard, Clarke, Mary·2014·Early Intervention in Psychiatry

Abstract

Aim: Early intervention (EI) services for psychosis aim to reduce the duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) with intensive large‐scale multi‐focus initiatives, including public awareness campaigns. As a consequence of this approach, individuals with a very long DUP who might have otherwise remained undiagnosed may come to medical attention. The aim of this study was to investigate if an EI service detected additional cases of individuals with a first‐episode psychosis (FEP) with a very long DUP and identify demographic and clinical characteristics associated with a very long DUP. Methods: We compared the distribution of the DUP in cases with FEP in a cohort from an EI service in a geographically defined catchment area with a historical control group. Participants were interviewed using the S tructured C linical I nterview for DSM IV (D iagnostic and S tatistical M anual of M ental D isorders, F ifth E dition) diagnoses and the Beiser scale to determine the DUP. Results: A total of 172 individuals were included in the EI service and 151 were included from the historical control. There was no difference in the distribution of the DUP in the EI service compared with the historical control group (χ 2 = 3.77, degrees of freedom (d.f.) = 3, P = 0.29). In the EI service, 7.6% of cases had a DUP between 24 and 35.9 months compared to 3.3% in the historical control, and 13.4% of cases in the EI service had a DUP of greater than three years compared to 10.6% in the historical control. A very long DUP was associated with unemployment, less insight and involuntary treatment. Conclusion: Further examination of the pathways to care in cases with a long DUP may clarify the contribution of help‐seeking and health system delays for these individuals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/eip.12063

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Donoghue, B., Lyne, J., Kinsella, A., Turner, N., O'Callaghan, E., & Clarke, M.
Affiliations
DETECT, Early Intervention in Psychosis Service Dublin Ireland
Corresponding author
O'Donoghue, Brian
Venue
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-06-20
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
332-339
ISSN
  • 1751-7885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7893
OpenAlex
W1538103911
Cited by
16
References
25
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
duration of untreated psychosis, first-episode psychosis, early intervention in psychosis, underdiagnosis, help-seeking, pathways to care, unemployment, insight, involuntary treatment, historical control groups
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Health Education, Humans, Mental Health Services, Psychotic Disorders, Time Factors, Program Evaluation, Early Diagnosis, Young Adult, Early Medical Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review