Cited by 37Psychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health Treatment and AccessMental Health and Patient Involvement

Creating an innovative youth mental health service in the United Kingdom: The Norfolk Youth Service

Open access
Wilson, Jon, Clarke, Tim, Lower, Rebecca, Ugochukwu, Uju, Maxwell, Sarah, Hodgekins, Jo, Wheeler, Karen, Goff, Andy +3 more·2018·Early Intervention in Psychiatry

Abstract

Young people attempting to access mental health services in the United Kingdom often find traditional models of care outdated, rigid, inaccessible and unappealing. Policy recommendations, research and service user opinion suggest that reform is needed to reflect the changing needs of young people. There is significant motivation in the United Kingdom to transform mental health services for young people, and this paper aims to describe the rationale, development and implementation of a novel youth mental health service in the United Kingdom, the Norfolk Youth Service. The Norfolk Youth Service model is described as a service model case study. The service rationale, national and local drivers, principles, aims, model, research priorities and future directions are reported. The Norfolk Youth Service is an innovative example of mental health transformation in the United Kingdom, comprising a pragmatic, assertive and “youth‐friendly” service for young people aged 14 to 25 that transcends traditional service boundaries. The service was developed in collaboration with young people and partnership agencies and is based on an engaging and inclusive ethos. The service is a social‐recovery oriented, evidence‐based and aims to satisfy recent policy guidance. The redesign and transformation of youth mental health services in the United Kingdom is long overdue. The Norfolk Youth Service represents an example of reform that aims to meet the developmental and transitional needs of young people at the same time as remaining youth‐oriented.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/eip.12452

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other jurisdictions have implemented variations of similar integrated youth mental health care models, adapted to local need as well as cultural, workforce, and financial factors.

    “Other jurisdictions-notably, Ireland, 289 Canada, 290-292 the UK, 293,294 Denmark, Singapore, 295 the USA, the Netherlands, 296 Japan, 297 South Korea, 298 Israel, 299 Hong Kong, 300 Iceland, France, 301 and New Zealand 302 -have implemented variations of similar models, which have been adapted to meet local need as well as cultural, workforce, and financial factors (panel”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [294]

    The Abstract and Future Directions (pages unavailable) identify the Norfolk Youth Service as a UK youth mental health service and describe it as a Headspace-inspired, integrated model. Local Context says it was developed in response to locally identified needs. The cited paper does not establish that cultural, workforce, and financial factors shaped this adaptation, so it supports the UK example and local-need portion, but not all of the stated factors. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age- of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62: 593-602.
  2. French P, Morrison AP. Early detection and cognitivetherapy forpeople at high risk of developing psychosis: atreatment approach. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley; 2004.
  3. Singh SP. Transition of care from child to adult mental health services: The great divide. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2009; 22: 386-390.
  4. Singh SP, Paul M, Ford T, et al. Process, outcome and experience of transition from child to adult mental healthcare: multiperspective study. Br J Psychiatry 2010; 197: 305-312.
  5. Murcott W. Transitions between child and adult mental health services: Service design, philosophy and meaning at uncertain times. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2014; 21: 628-34.
  6. Plaistow J, Masson K, Koch D, et al. Young people's views of UK mental health services. Early Interv Psychiatry 2014; 8: 12-23.
  7. McGorry P, Bates T, Birchwood M. Designing youth mental health services forthe 21 st century: examples from Australia, Ireland and the UK. Br J Psychiatry 2013; 202: 30-35.
  8. Lower R, Wilson J, Medin E, et al. Evaluating an early intervention in psychosis service for 'high risk' adolescents: symptomaticand social recovery outcomes. Early Interv Psychiatry 2015; 9: 260-267.
  9. Fowler D, Hodgekins J, Arena K, et al. Early detection and psychosocial interventions foryoung people who are at risk of developing long term socially disabling severe mental illness: Should we give equal priority to functional recovery and complex emotional dysfunction as to psychotic symptoms? Clin Neuropsychiatry 2010; 7: 63-71.
  10. Bertolote J, McGorry P. Early intervention and recovery foryoung people with early psychosis: consensus statement. Br J Psychiatry 2005; 187: 116-119.
  11. Coughlan H, Cannon M, Shiers D, et al. Towards a new paradigm of care: the international Declaration on Youth Mental Health. Early Interv Psychiatry 2013; 7: 103-108.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, J., Clarke, T., Lower, R., Ugochukwu, U., Maxwell, S., Hodgekins, J., Wheeler, K., Goff, A., Mack, R., Horne, R., & Fowler, D.
Affiliations
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Child, Family & Young People Service Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust Norfolk UK
  • University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Wilson, Jon
Venue
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08-04
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
740-746
ISSN
  • 1751-7885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7893
OpenAlex
W2611669637
Cited by
37
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research
  • Care East of England
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
child and adolescent mental health services, service model development, mental health service reform, youth-friendly services, social recovery, service user involvement, service redesign
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Adolescent Health Services, Program Development, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review