Cited by 40Eating Disorders and BehaviorsPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

National roll‐out of early intervention for eating disorders: Process and clinical outcomes from first episode rapid early intervention for eating disorders

Open access
Richards, Katie L., Hyam, Lucy, Allen, Karina L., Glennon, Danielle, Di Clemente, Giulia, Semple, Amy, Jackson, Aileen, Belli, Stefano R. +4 more·2023·Early Intervention in Psychiatry

Abstract

Aim: First Episode Rapid Early Intervention for Eating Disorders (FREED) is an early intervention model for young people with recent‐onset eating disorders (ED). Promising results from a previous single‐centre study and a four‐centre study (FREED‐Up) have led to the rapid national scaling of FREED to ED services in England (FREED‐4‐All). Our aim was to evaluate duration of an untreated ED (DUED), wait time target adherence, and clinical outcomes in FREED‐4‐All and compare these to the (benchmark) findings of the earlier FREED‐Up study. Method: FREED services submit de‐identified data to the central FREED team quarterly. The current study covers the period between September 2018 and September 2021. This FREED‐4‐All dataset includes 2473 patients. These were compared to 278 patients from the FREED‐Up study. Results: DUED was substantially shorter in the FREED‐4‐All dataset relative to the FREED‐Up study (15 vs. 18 months). Adherence to the wait time targets was comparable in both cohorts (~85% of engagement calls attempted in <2 days, ~50%–60% of assessments offered in <14 days, ~40% of treatment offered in <28 days). Patients in the FREED‐4‐All dataset experienced significant improvements in ED and general psychological symptoms from pre‐ to post‐treatment that were comparable to the FREED‐Up study. These findings should be interpreted cautiously as only 6% of FREED‐4‐All patients had post‐treatment data. Conclusions: Data from the FREED‐4‐All evaluation suggest that FREED is replicating at scale. However, these data are flawed, uncertain, proximate, and sparse and should therefore be used carefully alongside other evidence and clinical experience to inform decision making.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/eip.13317

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Richards, K. L., Hyam, L., Allen, K. L., Glennon, D., Di Clemente, G., Semple, A., Jackson, A., Belli, S. R., Dodge, E., Kilonzo, C., Holland, L., & Schmidt, U.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Eating Disorder Outpatient Service South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust London UK
  • Health Innovation Network South London (GB)
Corresponding author
Schmidt, Ulrike
Venue
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-06-08
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
202-211
ISSN
  • 1751-7885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7893
OpenAlex
W4281960099
Cited by
40
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3
FWCI
7.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Health Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
eating disorders, early intervention, clinical outcomes, youth, service replication, psychological symptoms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Feeding and Eating Disorders, England, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review