Cited by 126Iron Metabolism and DisordersTrace Elements in HealthErythropoietin and Anemia Treatment

Non‐anaemic iron deficiency – a disease looking for recognition of diagnosis: a systematic review

Pratt, Jeremy J., Khan, Khalid S.·2016·European Journal of Haematology

Abstract

Objective To capture all data meeting a rigid definition of non-anaemic iron deficiency (NAID) and determine whether it is associated with poor outcomes compared with normal iron status and whether iron supplementation improves outcomes in NAID. Design Systematic review. Data sources EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and Central from database inception to April 2014. Eligibility criteria Ferritin Results There were 21 studies included. NAID in pregnancy associated with reduction in birthweight (P = 0.028). Iron supplementation in NAID was associated with improvement in objective scores (P = 0.005) and self-rating (P = 0.03) of fatigue. Meta-analysis was limited and, where possible, was not statistically significant including the comparison of NAID with cardiovascular function in adults (VO2max P = 0.21, RERmax P = 0.68), educational attainment in children (P = 0.14), infant mental (P = 0.29) and psychomotor (P = 0.07) development, and iron supplementation in NAID with educational attainment in language (P = 0.31). Conclusions There is emerging evidence that NAID is a disease in its own right, deserving of further research in the development of strategies for detection and treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ejh.12645

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two systematic reviews including pregnant women, blood donors and children concluded benefit of iron supplementation, although in the review by Yokoi and Konomi, the benefit was limited to randomised controlled trials.

    “Two systematic reviews included studies of pregnant women, blood donors and children and included data from both randomised and non-randomised trials.38 39 These studies concluded benefit of iron supplementation, although in the review by Yokoi and Konomi39, the benefit was limited to randomised controlled trials.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pratt, J. J., & Khan, K. S.
Affiliations
  • Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Pratt, Jeremy J.
Venue
European Journal of Haematology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-09-17
Volume
96
Issue
6
Pages
618-628
ISSN
  • 0902-4441 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0609
OpenAlex
W1900257882
Cited by
126
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal Of Haematology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Trace Elements in Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Keywords
iron deficiency, ferritin, iron supplementation, pregnancy, birth weight, fatigue, cardiovascular function, VO2max, educational attainment, infant development, psychomotor development, disease identification
MeSH terms
Clinical Studies as Topic, Iron Deficiencies, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Ferritins, Humans, Iron, Male, Phenotype, Pregnancy, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review