Cited by 38Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transportSoil Management and Crop Yield

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cereal straw incorporation and ryegrass cover crops: The path to equilibrium in soil carbon storage is short

Abstract

Reduced use of fossil energy by removing cereal straw for bioenergy potentially threatens soil organic carbon (SOC) storage. Straw incorporation plays a key role for SOC storage in cereal‐based cropping systems, but the use of cover crops (CCs) may compensate for straw removal. However, assessing the SOC sequestration potential of management changes requires field experiments with long continued treatments and frequent soil sampling. Based on a field experiment initiated in 1981 on a sandy loam soil at Askov Experimental Station (Denmark), we examined the effect of annual additions of spring barley straw (0, 4, 8 and 12 Mg ha −1 ) and undersown ryegrass CC on SOC storage in the 0‐ to 20‐cm layer. The effect of straw incorporation and CC on SOC was additive. At steady‐state conditions, the SOC stock based on equivalent soil mass (SOC stock FM ) increased 3.9, 6.7 and 9.3 Mg C ha −1 after annual incorporation of 4, 8 and 12 Mg straw ha −1 , respectively. The ryegrass CC increased SOC stock FM by 3.3 Mg C ha −1 and thus almost compensated for removal of 4 Mg straw ha −1 . An asymptotic regression model best described the temporal changes in SOC and showed that the effect of straw incorporation and ryegrass CC on SOC sequestration peaks after 10–15 years when a new equilibrium between input and output of C is reached. Clearly, reliable assessments of SOC sequestration potentials following changes in management require field experiments with frequent soil sampling until reaching steady‐state conditions. Highlights: SOC sequestration potentials of straw incorporation and CCs were assessed. The crucial issue of sequestration duration of experimental treatments is often neglected. The effect of straw and CC peaked after 10–15 years when a new equilibrium in SOC was reached. Reliable assessments require frequent soil sampling until reaching steady‐state conditions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ejss.13173

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.2489/jswc.71.1.41 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.02.016 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/saj2.20129 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0038-0717(85)90047-1 · DOI
  5. Christensen B. T., 1996, Structure and organic matter storage in agricultural soils, 97
  6. 10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Gee G. W., 2002, Methods of soil analysis. Part 4 – Physical methods, 255
  8. 10.1111/gcbb.12733 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/ejss.12738 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114181 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.10.034 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108228 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)00801-8 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.029 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.csda.2008.12.013 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.016 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/ncomms7995 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1111/sum.12001 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/gcb.13850 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.01.002 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.03.028 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.024 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1111/gcb.14066 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.2134/agronj2010.0146s · DOI · Paper page
  25. Schjønning P., 1986, Incorporation of straw in continuous growing of spring barley II. Influence of straw and stubble tillage upon the soil content of carbon, nitrogen, potassium and phosphorus, Tidsskrift for Planteavl, 90, 141
  26. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00854.x · DOI
  27. 10.1111/gcb.14815 · DOI
  28. Soil Survey Staff, 2014, Keys to soil taxonomy
  29. 10.1080/09064719509413100 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2004.tb00393.x · DOI
  31. 10.1002/jpln.201600451 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/S0167-1987(03)00018-7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jensen, J. L., Eriksen, J., Thomsen, I. K., Munkholm, L. J., & Christensen, B. T.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Venue
European Journal of Soil Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-10-29
Volume
73
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2389
OpenAlex
W3199220125
Cited by
38
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Soil Science (publishedVersion)
  • Scopus (Elsevier) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Miljø- og Fødevareministeriet (33010‐NIFA‐19‐708)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
Keywords
soil organic carbon sequestration, steady-state equilibrium, long-term field experiment, soil carbon stocks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review