The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The dissimilarity of species interaction networks
Abstract
In a context of global changes, and amidst the perpetual modification of community structure undergone by most natural ecosystems, it is more important than ever to understand how species interactions vary through space and time. The integration of biogeography and network theory will yield important results and further our understanding of species interactions. It has, however, been hampered so far by the difficulty to quantify variation among interaction networks. Here, we propose a general framework to study the dissimilarity of species interaction networks over time, space or environments, allowing both the use of quantitative and qualitative data. We decompose network dissimilarity into interactions and species turnover components, so that it is immediately comparable to common measures of β‐diversity. We emphasise that scaling up β‐diversity of community composition to the β‐diversity of interactions requires only a small methodological step, which we foresee will help empiricists adopt this method. We illustrate the framework with a large dataset of hosts and parasites interactions and highlight other possible usages. We discuss a research agenda towards a biogeographical theory of species interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services
Worm, B., Barbier, E. B., Beaumont, N., Duffy, J. E., Folke, C., Halpern, B. S., Jackson, J. B. C., Lotze, H. K., Micheli, F., Palumbi, S. R., et al. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1132294 · Cited by 4,544
Will a Large Complex System be Stable?
MAY, R. M. (1972) · Nature · doi:10.1038/238413a0 · Cited by 2,869
Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the consumer connection
Duffy, J. E. (2002) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990201.x · Cited by 653 · cited 2×
“Network structure is a key theme for numerous ecological topics, including ecosystem stability (May 1972; Allesina & Pascual 2007; Rooney & McCann 2012), functioning (Duffy 2002) and resilience to exploitation or species extinction (Worm & Duffy 2003; Worm et al. 2006).”
BackgroundEmerging horizons in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research
Reiss, J., Bridle, J. R., Montoya, J. M., & Woodward, G. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.018 · Cited by 607
Cited by
Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks
CaraDonna, P. J., Petry, W. K., Brennan, R. M., Cunningham, J. L., Bronstein, J. L., Waser, N. M., & Sanders, N. J. (2017) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12740 · Cited by 395
Indigenous knowledge networks in the face of global change
Cámara-Leret, R., Fortuna, M. A., & Bascompte, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1821843116 · Cited by 127
EcologicalNetworks.jl: analysing ecological networks of species interactions
Poisot, T., Bélisle, Z., Hoebeke, L., Stock, M., & Szefer, P. (2019) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.04310 · Cited by 16
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Poisot, T., Canard, E., Mouillot, D., Mouquet, N., & Gravel, D.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-09-20
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1353-1361
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2166673955
- Cited by
- 544
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.