The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems
Open accessAbstract
Bees provide essential pollination services that are potentially affected both by local farm management and the surrounding landscape. To better understand these different factors, we modelled the relative effects of landscape composition (nesting and floral resources within foraging distances), landscape configuration (patch shape, interpatch connectivity and habitat aggregation) and farm management (organic vs. conventional and local‐scale field diversity), and their interactions, on wild bee abundance and richness for 39 crop systems globally. Bee abundance and richness were higher in diversified and organic fields and in landscapes comprising more high‐quality habitats; bee richness on conventional fields with low diversity benefited most from high‐quality surrounding land cover. Landscape configuration effects were weak. Bee responses varied slightly by biome. Our synthesis reveals that pollinator persistence will depend on both the maintenance of high‐quality habitats around farms and on local management practices that may offset impacts of intensive monoculture agriculture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As a result, these alternative agricultural practices are acknowledged to improve biodiversity and the overall sustainability of agricultural systems6–11.”
From Farming practices to enhance biodiversity across biomes: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“Many previous reviews or meta-analyses on the impacts of farming on biodiversity have either focused on farming systems as a whole6,9, such as circular agriculture12, regenerative agriculture13 or organic agriculture14, or on individual practices or taxonomic groups15–17.”
From Farming practices to enhance biodiversity across biomes: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“The finding that alternative practices benefit biodiversity is coherent with earlier work showing that some of these practices16,19 and associated agricultural systems6,9 gave positive outcomes for biodiversity.”
From Farming practices to enhance biodiversity across biomes: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790942 · Cited by 13,597
Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity
Fahrig, L. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419 · Cited by 7,879
Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops
Klein, A., Vaissière, B., Cane, J. H., Steffan-Dewenter, I. D., Cunningham, S. A., Kremen, C., & Tscharntke, T. (2006) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3721 · Cited by 7,211
Self-citationGlobal pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers
Potts, S. G., Biesmeijer, J. C., Kremen, C., Neumann, P., Schweiger, O., & Kunin, W. E. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007 · Cited by 6,458
Self-citationModel Selection and Multimodel Inference
(2003) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2003.s146 · Cited by 5,509
Bartoń, K. (2010) · CRAN: Contributed Packages · doi:10.32614/cran.package.mumin · Cited by 4,829
Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity—Ecosystem service management
Tscharntke, T., Klein, A. M., Kruess, A., Steffan‐Dewenter, I., & Thies, C. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x · Cited by 4,455
Self-citationSimple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients
Schielzeth, H. (2010) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00012.x · Cited by 3,027 · cited 1×
“To interpret the main effects in the presence of interactions, we mean-centred continuous covariates (Gelman & Hill 2007; Schielzeth 2010).”
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Bates D., 2011, R Package Version 0.999375‐39
- McGarigal K., 2002, FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps
- 10.1023/A:1008107902848 · DOI
- Tallis H.T., 2011, InVEST 2.1 beta User's Guide: Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs, 260
- Westrich P., 1996, The Conservation of Bees, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers
Goulson, D., Nicholls, E., Botías, C., & Rotheray, E. L. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1255957 · Cited by 4,074
Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being
Potts, S. G., Imperatriz-Fonseca, V., Ngo, H. T., Aizen, M. A., Biesmeijer, J. C., Breeze, T. D., Dicks, L. V., Garibaldi, L. A., Hill, R., Settele, J., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature20588 · Cited by 2,138
Self-citationOrganic agriculture in the twenty-first century
Reganold, J. P., & Wachter, J. M. (2016) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/nplants.2015.221 · Cited by 2,130
Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services
Brockerhoff, E. G., Barbaro, L., Castagneyrol, B., Forrester, D. I., Gardiner, B., González‐Olabarria, J. R., Lyver, P. O., Meurisse, N., Oxbrough, A. G., Taki, H., et al. (2017) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-017-1453-2 · Cited by 1,403
Self-citationGrasslands—more important for ecosystem services than you might think
Bengtsson, J., Bullock, J. M., Egoh, B. N., Everson, C. S., Everson, T. M., O'Connor, T. G., O’Farrell, P. J., Smith, H. G., & Lindborg, R. (2019) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.2582 · Cited by 1,223
Metadata
- Authors
- Kennedy, C. M., Lonsdorf, E., Neel, M. C., Williams, N. M., Ricketts, T. H., Winfree, R., Bommarco, R., Brittain, C., Burley, A. L., Cariveau, D., Carvalheiro, L. G., Chacoff, N. P., Cunningham, S. A., Danforth, B. N., Dudenhöffer, J., Elle, E., Gaines, H. R., Garibaldi, L. A., Gratton, C., Holzschuh, A., Isaacs, R., Javorek, S. K., Jha, S., Klein, A. M., Krewenka, K., Mandelik, Y., Mayfield, M. M., Morandin, L., Neame, L. A., Otieno, M., Park, M., Potts, S. G., Rundlöf, M., Saez, A., Steffan‐Dewenter, I., Taki, H., Viana, B. F., Westphal, C., Wilson, J. K., Greenleaf, S. S., & Kremen, C.
- Affiliations
- Lincoln Park Zoo (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- University of Vermont (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
- Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Naturalis Biodiversity Center (NL)
- National University of Tucumán (AR)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Cornell University (US)
- University of Göttingen (DE)
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- Department of Entomology University of Wisconsin 1630 Linden Drive Madison WI 53706 USA
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- University of Würzburg (DE)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- University of Reading (GB)
- Lund University (SE)
- Laboratorio Ecotono‐CRUB Universidad Nacional del Comahue ‐ INIBIOMA (8400) San Carlos de Bariloche Río Negro Argentina
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology Biocenter University of Würzburg Am Hubland 97074 Würzburg Germany
- Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute (JP)
- Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kennedy, Christina M.
- ORCID
- Kennedy, Christina M.
- Lonsdorf, Eric
- Neel, Maile C.
- Williams, Neal M.
- Ricketts, Taylor H.
- Winfree, Rachael
- Bommarco, Riccardo
- Brittain, Claire
- Cariveau, Daniel
- Carvalheiro, Luísa G.
- Chacoff, Natacha P.
- Cunningham, Saul A.
- Danforth, Bryan N.
- Dudenhöffer, Jan‐Hendrik
- Elle, Elizabeth
- Garibaldi, Lucas A.
- Gratton, Claudio
- Holzschuh, Andrea
- Isaacs, Rufus
- Jha, Shalene
- Klein, Alexandra M.
- Krewenka, Kristin
- Mandelik, Yael
- Mayfield, Margaret M.
- Morandin, Lora
- Otieno, Mark
- Park, Mia
- Potts, Simon G.
- Rundlöf, Maj
- Taki, Hisatomo
- Viana, Blandina Felipe
- Westphal, Catrin
- Wilson, Julianna K.
- Kremen, Claire
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-03-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 584-599
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2151300021
- Cited by
- 1,255
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 83 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 129 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 126 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 94 · 2016: 89 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 20
- FWCI
- 84.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ecology Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (publishedVersion)
- Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- GRO (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion)
- CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0072909, 0919128)
- World Wildlife Fund
- Harvard University
- New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station
- Nature Conservancy
- European Commission (244090)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KL 1849/4-1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect and Pesticide Research
- Keywords
- wild bees, pollinators, agroecosystems, landscape composition, landscape configuration, farm management, organic farming, conventional farming, nesting habitat, floral resources, patch connectivity, pollinator abundance, pollinator species richness, pollination services, monoculture agriculture, land cover
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Animals, Bees, Climate, Models, Theoretical, Population Density, Ecosystem, Crops, Agricultural, Flowers, Pollination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
