The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An experimental test of the hypothesis of non‐homeostatic consumer stoichiometry in a plant litter–microbe system
Abstract
Stoichiometric homeostasis of heterotrophs is a common, but not always well‐examined premise in ecological stoichiometry. We experimentally evaluated the relationship between substrate (plant litter) and consumer (microorganisms) stoichiometry for a tropical terrestrial decomposer system. Variation in microbial C : P and N : P ratios tracked that of the soluble litter fraction, but not that of bulk leaf litter material. Microbial N and P were not isometrically related, suggesting higher rates of P than N sequestration in microbial biomass. Shifts in microbial stoichiometry were related to changes in microbial community structure. Our results indicate that P in dissolved form is a major driver of terrestrial microbial stoichiometry, similar to aquatic environments. The demonstrated relative plasticity in microbial C : P and N : P and the critical role of P have important implications for theoretical modelling and contribute to a process‐based understanding of stoichiometric relationships and the flow of elements across trophic levels in decomposer systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass?
Cleveland, C. C., & Liptzin, D. (2007) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-007-9132-0 · Cited by 2,365
Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs
Elser, J. J., Fagan, W. F., Denno, R. F., Dobberfuhl, D. R., Folarin, A., Huberty, A., Interlandi, S., Kilham, S. S., McCauley, E., Schulz, K. L., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35046058 · Cited by 1,645
Cited by
Mooshammer, M., Wanek, W., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., & Richter, A. (2014) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00022 · Cited by 930
Stoichiometry of microbial carbon use efficiency in soils
Sinsabaugh, R. L., Turner, B. L., Talbot, J. M., Waring, B. G., Powers, J. S., Kuske, C. R., Moorhead, D. L., & Follstad Shah, J. J. (2016) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/15-2110.1 · Cited by 567
Patterns and mechanisms of responses by soil microbial communities to nitrogen addition
Zhou, Z., Wang, C., Zheng, M., Jiang, L., & Luo, Y. (2017) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.09.015 · Cited by 482
Nutrient limitation of soil microbial processes in tropical forests
Camenzind, T., Hättenschwiler, S., Treseder, K. K., Lehmann, A., & Rillig, M. C. (2018) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1002/ecm.1279 · Cited by 454
Self-citationSoil microbial biomass C:N:P stoichiometry and microbial use of organic phosphorus
Heuck, C., Weig, A., & Spohn, M. (2015) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.029 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Fanin, N., Fromin, N., Buatois, B., & Hättenschwiler, S.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-03-25
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 764-772
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2100108482
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An experimental test of the hypothesis of non‐homeostatic consumer stoichiometry in a plant litter–microbe system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ele.12108
- The paper
- Fanin, N., Fromin, N., Buatois, B., & Hättenschwiler, S. (2013). An experimental test of the hypothesis of non‐homeostatic consumer stoichiometry in a plant litter–microbe system. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.