The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning
Abstract
Beta diversity can be measured in different ways. Among these, the total variance of the community data table Y can be used as an estimate of beta diversity. We show how the total variance of Y can be calculated either directly or through a dissimilarity matrix obtained using any dissimilarity index deemed appropriate for pairwise comparisons of community composition data. We addressed the question of which index to use by coding 16 indices using 14 properties that are necessary for beta assessment, comparability among data sets, sampling issues and ordination. Our comparison analysis classified the coefficients under study into five types, three of which are appropriate for beta diversity assessment. Our approach links the concept of beta diversity with the analysis of community data by commonly used methods like ordination and anova . Total beta can be partitioned into Species Contributions ( SCBD : degree of variation of individual species across the study area) and Local Contributions ( LCBD : comparative indicators of the ecological uniqueness of the sites) to Beta Diversity. Moreover, total beta can be broken up into within‐ and among‐group components by manova , into orthogonal axes by ordination, into spatial scales by eigenfunction analysis or among explanatory data sets by variation partitioning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942661 · Cited by 8,377
Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data
Legendre, P., & Gallagher, E. D. (2001) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420100716 · Cited by 5,556
Self-citationDistance‐Based Tests for Homogeneity of Multivariate Dispersions
Anderson, M. J. (2006) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00440.x · Cited by 3,304
Cited by
vegan: Community Ecology Package
Oksanen, J., Simpson, G. L., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O'Hara, R. B., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., Szoecs, E., et al. (2001) · CRAN: Contributed Packages · doi:10.32614/cran.package.vegan · Cited by 22,615
Self-citationInterpreting the replacement and richness difference components of beta diversity
Legendre, P. (2014) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/geb.12207 · Cited by 1,115
Self-citationStatistical methods for temporal and space–time analysis of community composition data
Legendre, P., & Gauthier, O. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2728 · Cited by 299
Self-citationEffectiveness of ecological rescue for altered soil microbial communities and functions
Calderón, K., Spor, A., Breuil, M.-C., Bru, D., Bizouard, F., Violle, C., Barnard, R. L., & Philippot, L. (2017) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.86 · Cited by 205
Three points to consider when choosing a LM or GLM test for count data
Warton, D. I., Lyons, M., Stoklosa, J., & Ives, A. R. (2016) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12552 · Cited by 192
“Somewhat con-cerningly, this area is currently the one where the data transformation approach seems to be most common ( e.g. Anderson et al. 2011; Legendre & De C (cid:1) aceres 2013).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Legendre, P., & De Cáceres, M.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 951-963
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2155432052
- Cited by
- 1,522
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 35.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ele.12141
- The paper
- Legendre, P., & De Cáceres, M. (2013). Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12141
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.