The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Historical contingency in species interactions: towards niche‐based predictions
Open accessAbstract
The way species affect one another in ecological communities often depends on the order of species arrival. The magnitude of such historical contingency, known as priority effects, varies across species and environments, but this variation has proven difficult to predict, presenting a major challenge in understanding species interactions and consequences for community structure and function. Here, we argue that improved predictions can be achieved by decomposing species' niches into three components: overlap, impact and requirement. Based on classic theories of community assembly, three hypotheses that emphasise related, but distinct influences of the niche components are proposed: priority effects are stronger among species with higher resource use overlap; species that impact the environment to a greater extent exert stronger priority effects; and species whose growth rate is more sensitive to changes in the environment experience stronger priority effects. Using nectar‐inhabiting microorganisms as a model system, we present evidence that these hypotheses complement the conventional hypothesis that focuses on the role of environmental harshness, and show that niches can be twice as predictive when separated into components. Taken together, our hypotheses provide a basis for developing a general framework within which the magnitude of historical contingency in species interactions can be predicted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1957.022.01.039 · Cited by 6,228
Lavorel, S., & Garnier, E. (2002) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x · Cited by 3,452
SUDING, K. N., LAVOREL, S., CHAPIN, F. S., CORNELISSEN, J. H. C., DÍAZ, S., GARNIER, E., GOLDBERG, D., HOOPER, D. U., JACKSON, S. T., & NAVAS, M. (2008) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01557.x · Cited by 1,285
Experimental Studies on the Struggle for Existence
Gause, G. F. (1932) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.9.4.389 · Cited by 401
Cited by
Stochastic Community Assembly: Does It Matter in Microbial Ecology?
Zhou, J., & Ning, D. (2017) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00002-17 · Cited by 2,773
Role of priority effects in the early-life assembly of the gut microbiota
Sprockett, D., Fukami, T., & Relman, D. A. (2018) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2017.173 · Cited by 419
Self-citationLinking modern coexistence theory and contemporary niche theory
Letten, A. D., Ke, P., & Fukami, T. (2017) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1002/ecm.1242 · Cited by 363
Self-citationEffectiveness of ecological rescue for altered soil microbial communities and functions
Calderón, K., Spor, A., Breuil, M.-C., Bru, D., Bizouard, F., Violle, C., Barnard, R. L., & Philippot, L. (2017) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.86 · Cited by 205
Genetic basis of priority effects: insights from nectar yeast
Dhami, M. K., Hartwig, T., & Fukami, T. (2016) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.1455 · Cited by 60
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vannette, R. L., & Fukami, T.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-11-20
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115-124
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2116094864
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Historical contingency in species interactions: towards niche‐based predictions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ele.12204
- The paper
- Vannette, R. L., & Fukami, T. (2014). Historical contingency in species interactions: towards niche‐based predictions. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.