The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Woody plants optimise stomatal behaviour relative to hydraulic risk
Open accessAbstract
Stomatal response to environmental conditions forms the backbone of all ecosystem and carbon cycle models, but is largely based on empirical relationships. Evolutionary theories of stomatal behaviour are critical for guarding against prediction errors of empirical models under future climates. Longstanding theory holds that stomata maximise fitness by acting to maintain constant marginal water use efficiency over a given time horizon, but a recent evolutionary theory proposes that stomata instead maximise carbon gain minus carbon costs/risk of hydraulic damage. Using data from 34 species that span global forest biomes, we find that the recent carbon‐maximisation optimisation theory is widely supported, revealing that the evolution of stomatal regulation has not been primarily driven by attainment of constant marginal water use efficiency. Optimal control of stomata to manage hydraulic risk is likely to have significant consequences for ecosystem fluxes during drought, which is critical given projected intensification of the global hydrological cycle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., & Berry, J. A. (1980) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386231 · Cited by 8,796
Anderegg, W. R. L., Klein, T., Bartlett, M., Sack, L., Pellegrini, A. F. A., Choat, B., & Jansen, S. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1525678113 · Cited by 882
Self-citation
Cited by
Hydraulic diversity of forests regulates ecosystem resilience during drought
Anderegg, W. R. L., Konings, A. G., Trugman, A. T., Yu, K., Bowling, D. R., Gabbitas, R., Karp, D. S., Pacala, S., Sperry, J. S., Sulman, B. N., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0539-7 · Cited by 674
Self-citationImplementing Plant Hydraulics in the Community Land Model, Version 5
Kennedy, D., Swenson, S., Oleson, K. W., Lawrence, D. M., Fisher, R., Lola da Costa, A. C., & Gentine, P. (2019) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2018ms001500 · Cited by 432
Tree carbon allocation explains forest drought‐kill and recovery patterns
Trugman, A. T., Detto, M., Bartlett, M. K., Medvigy, D., Anderegg, W. R. L., Schwalm, C., Schaffer, B., & Pacala, S. W. (2018) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.13136 · Cited by 341
Self-citationHammond, W. M., Yu, K., Wilson, L. A., Will, R. E., Anderegg, W. R. L., & Adams, H. D. (2019) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15922 · Cited by 339
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderegg, W. R. L., Wolf, A., Arango‐Velez, A., Choat, B., Chmura, D. J., Jansen, S., Kolb, T., Li, S., Meinzer, F. C., Pita, P., Resco de Dios, V., Sperry, J. S., Wolfe, B. T., & Pacala, S.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-04-23
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 968-977
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2799436130
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Woody plants optimise stomatal behaviour relative to hydraulic risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ele.12962
- The paper
- Anderegg, W. R. L., Wolf, A., Arango‐Velez, A., Choat, B., Chmura, D. J., Jansen, S., Kolb, T., Li, S., Meinzer, F. C., Pita, P., Resco de Dios, V., Sperry, J. S., Wolfe, B. T., & Pacala, S. (2018). Woody plants optimise stomatal behaviour relative to hydraulic risk. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12962
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.