Cited by 44Wildlife Ecology and ConservationEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

Acoustic restoration: Using soundscapes to benchmark and fast‐track recovery of ecological communities

Open access
Znidersic, Elizabeth, Watson, David M.·2022·Ecology Letters

Abstract

We introduce a new approach—acoustic restoration—focusing on the applied utility of soundscapes for restoration, recognising the rich ecological and social values they encapsulate. Broadcasting soundscapes in disturbed areas can accelerate recolonisation of animals and the microbes and propagules they carry; long duration recordings are also ideal sources of data for benchmarking restoration initiatives and evocative engagement tools.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ele.14015

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It remains unclear if soundscapes reliably track the restoration of faunal biodiversity in tropical forests.

    “These studies show that forest loss and degradation can be tracked by using soundscapes, but it remains unclear if soundscapes reliably track the restoration of faunal biodiversity in tropical forests23.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Arnold, J.M., Nisbet, I.C.T. & Veit, R. (2011) Assessing aural and visual cueing as tools for seabird management. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 75, 495– 500.
  2. Brown, S.L., Reid, N., Reid, J., Smith, R., Whalley, R.D.B. & Carr, D. (2017) Topsoil removal and carbon addition for weed control and native grass recruitment in a temperate derived grassland in northern New South Wales. The Rangeland Journal, 39, 355– 361.
  3. Butler, J., Stanley, J.A. & Butler, M.J. (2016) Underwater soundscapes in near‐shore tropical habitats and the effects of environmental degradation and habitat restoration. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 479, 89– 96.
  4. Feld, S., Barker, M. & Nakassis, C. (2020) Spectral signage: a discussion with Steven Feld. Semiotic Review, 9.
  5. Greenberg, C.H. & Collins, B.S. (2015) Natural disturbances and historic range of variation: Type, frequency, severity, and post‐disturbance structure in Central Hardwood Forests USA. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
  6. Jones, H.P. & Kress, S.W. (2012) A review of the world's active seabird restoration projects. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 76, 2– 9.
  7. Linhart, Y.B. (1995). Restoration, revegetation, and the importance of genetic and evolutionary perspectives. In Roundy, B.A. et al. (ed.), Proceedings of the Wildland Shrub and Arid Land Restoration Symposium, Las Vegas, NV. 19–21 Oct. 1993. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT‐GTR‐315, pp. 271–287. U.S. Forest Service, Ogden, UT.
  8. Putman, B.J. & Blumstein, D.T. (2019) What is the effectiveness of using conspecific or heterospecific acoustic playbacks for the attraction of animals for wildlife management? A systematic review protocol. Environmental Evidence, 8, 6.
  9. Woldendorp, G. & Keenan, R.J. (2005) Coarse woody debris in Australian forest ecosystems: a review. Austral Ecology, 30, 834– 843.
  10. Zahawi, R.A., Holl, K.D., Cole, R.J. & Reid, J.L. (2013) Testing applied nucleation as a restoration strategy to facilitate tropical forest recovery. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50, 88– 96.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Znidersic, E., & Watson, D. M.
Affiliations
Charles Sturt University (AU)
Corresponding author
Znidersic, Elizabeth
Venue
Ecology Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-04-26
Volume
25
Issue
7
Pages
1597-1603
ISSN
  • 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-0248
OpenAlex
W4224948089
Cited by
44
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 4
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecology Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Charles Sturt University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords
soundscape, ecological restoration, community recovery, recolonization, bioacoustics, audio playback, microbial dispersal, propagule dispersal, citizen participation
MeSH terms
Acoustics, Animals, Ecosystem, Benchmarking, Biota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review