Cited by 20Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesSustainable Development and Environmental PolicyAquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The global value of freshwater lakes

Open access
Li, Xingming, Tsigaris, Panagiotis·2024·Ecology Letters

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Lakes face threats from human activities like unsustainable development, population growth and industrial technologies. These challenges impact the ecosystem services of lakes. Research has assessed the monetary value of services from freshwater biomes annually. This article reviews these values, estimating lakes' global ecosystem services to be within the region of USD 1.3–5.1 trillion annually. Their natural asset value is estimated at USD 87–340 trillion, comparable to the monetary value of global real estate, assuming a relatively high social discount rate to account for future increased standards of living. Considering environmental degradation, future generations may experience a lower living standard. Using a 0.1% discount rate, recognizing potential harm and aligning with indigenous values raises the lakes' value to USD 1300–5100 trillion, which is at least equal to the global monetary value of wealth created. This valuation is shared by all as a collective asset, unlike the skewed distribution of created wealth.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ele.14388

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1029/2019gb006222 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/s41559‐020‐1216‐4 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.3138/cpp.36.3.325 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/s41467‐020‐20704‐0 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/s41597‐019‐0316‐y · DOI
  6. 10.1111/gcb.13173 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/rfs/hhab028 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/387253a0 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1021/es4021052 · DOI
  11. 10.4319/lo.2006.51.5.2388 · DOI
  12. 10.1257/pol.20160240 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.002 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.5822/978-1-61091-542-7_8 · DOI
  15. Fleurbaey M., 2012, Climate policies deserve a negative discount rate, Chicago Journal of International Law, 13, 565
  16. 10.1007/s13280‐021‐01544‐8 · DOI
  17. Freeman M., 2018, Social discount rates for cost‐benefit analysis: a report for HM Treasury
  18. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107072 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/heapol/czz127 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/brv.12647 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1007/978-94-017-9930-0_2 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1467‐6419.2009.00592.x · DOI
  23. 10.1002/2013ef000184 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.019 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.028 · DOI
  26. 10.5268/IW‐1.1.384 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/ncomms13603 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.02.037 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/faf.12089 · DOI
  30. Pigou A., 1920, The economics of welfare
  31. 10.2307/2224098 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.001 · DOI
  33. 10.1029/2020wr028351 · DOI
  34. 10.1098/rspb.2019.0834 · DOI
  35. Solow R.M., 1974, The economics of resources or the resources of economics, The American Economic Review, 64, 1
  36. 10.1007/s13280‐011‐0185‐x · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s10818‐017‐9243‐1 · DOI
  38. 10.1257/aer.98.2.1 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.012 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/2014GL060641 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1093/reep/rer006 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Li, X., & Tsigaris, P.
Affiliations
Thompson Rivers University (CA)
Corresponding author
Tsigaris, Panagiotis
Venue
Ecology Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-02
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
e14388-e14388
ISSN
  • 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-0248
OpenAlex
W4392128246
Cited by
20
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 7
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecology Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
Keywords
freshwater lakes, ecosystem services, economic valuation, natural capital, social discount rate, environmental degradation, indigenous values, wealth distribution
MeSH terms
Conservation of Natural Resources, Humans, Ecosystem, Lakes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review