Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Impact of blood pressure changes and course on hematoma growth in acute intracerebral hemorrhage

Rodriguez‐Luna, D., Piñeiro, S., Rubiera, M., Ribo, M., Coscojuela, P., Pagola, J., Flores, A., Muchada, M., Ibarra, B., Meler, P., Sanjuan, E., Hernandez‐Guillamon, M., Alvarez‐Sabin, J., Montaner, J., Molina, C. A.·2013·European Journal of Neurology

Abstract

Background and purpose: An association between high blood pressure (BP) in acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and hematoma growth (HG) has not been clearly demonstrated. Therefore, the impact of BP changes and course on HG and clinical outcome in patients with acute ICH was determined. Methods: In total, 117 consecutive patients with acute (<6 h) supratentorial ICH underwent baseline and 24‐h CT scans, CT angiography for the detection of the spot sign and non‐invasive BP monitoring at 15‐min intervals over the first 24 h. Maximum and minimum BP, maximum BP increase and drop from baseline, and BP variability values from systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were calculated. SBP and MAP loads were defined as the proportion of readings >180 and >130 mmHg, respectively. HG (>33% or >6 ml), early neurological deterioration (END) and 3‐month mortality were recorded. Results: Baseline BP variables were unrelated to either HG or clinical outcome. Conversely, SBP 180‐load independently predicted HG (odds ratio 1.05, 95% CI 1.010–1.097, P = 0.016), whilst both SBP 180‐load (odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI 1.001–1.076, P = 0.042) and SBP variability (odds ratio 1.2, 95% CI 1.047–1.380, P = 0.009) independently predicted END. Although none of the BP monitoring variables was associated with HG in the spot‐sign‐positive group, higher maximum BP increases from baseline and higher SBP and MAP loads were significantly related to HG in the spot‐sign‐negative group. Conclusions: In patients with acute supratentorial ICH, SBP 180‐load independently predicts HG, whilst both SBP 180‐load and SBP variability predict END.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ene.12180

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
Rodriguez‐Luna, D., Piñeiro, S., Rubiera, M., Ribo, M., Coscojuela, P., Pagola, J., Flores, A., Muchada, M., Ibarra, B., Meler, P., Sanjuan, E., Hernandez‐Guillamon, M., Alvarez‐Sabin, J., Montaner, J., & Molina, C. A.
Venue
European Journal of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-05-05
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
1277-1283
ISSN
  • 1351-5101 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-1331
OpenAlex
W1994814579
Cited by
191
References
0
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of blood pressure changes and course on hematoma growth in acute intracerebral hemorrhage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ene.12180
The paper
Rodriguez‐Luna, D., Piñeiro, S., Rubiera, M., Ribo, M., Coscojuela, P., Pagola, J., Flores, A., Muchada, M., Ibarra, B., Meler, P., Sanjuan, E., Hernandez‐Guillamon, M., Alvarez‐Sabin, J., Montaner, J., & Molina, C. A. (2013). Impact of blood pressure changes and course on hematoma growth in acute intracerebral hemorrhage. European Journal of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12180

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.