Cited by 37Epilepsy research and treatmentEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Wearable devices for seizure detection: Practical experiences and recommendations from the Wearables for Epilepsy And Research (WEAR) International Study Group

Open access
Bruno, Elisa, Böttcher, Sebastian, Viana, Pedro F., Amengual‐Gual, Marta, Joseph, Boney, Epitashvili, Nino, Dümpelmann, Matthias, Glasstetter, Martin +6 more·2021·Epilepsia

Abstract

The Wearables for Epilepsy And Research (WEAR) International Study Group identified a set of methodology standards to guide research on wearable devices for seizure detection. We formed an international consortium of experts from clinical research, engineering, computer science, and data analytics at the beginning of 2020. The study protocols and practical experience acquired during the development of wearable research studies were discussed and analyzed during bi‐weekly virtual meetings to highlight commonalities, strengths, and weaknesses, and to formulate recommendations. Seven major essential components of the experimental design were identified, and recommendations were formulated about: (1) description of study aims, (2) policies and agreements, (3) study population, (4) data collection and technical infrastructure, (5) devices, (6) reporting results, and (7) data sharing. Introducing a framework of methodology standards promotes optimal, accurate, and consistent data collection. It also guarantees that studies are generalizable and comparable, and that results can be replicated, validated, and shared.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/epi.17044

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bruno, E., Böttcher, S., Viana, P. F., Amengual‐Gual, M., Joseph, B., Epitashvili, N., Dümpelmann, M., Glasstetter, M., Biondi, A., Van Laerhoven, K., Loddenkemper, T., Richardson, M. P., Schulze‐Bonhage, A., & Brinkmann, B. H.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Ubiquitous Computing Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Siegen Siegen Germany
Corresponding author
Brinkmann, Benjamin H.
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-08-22
Volume
62
Issue
10
Pages
2307-2321
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W3194220803
Cited by
37
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epilepsia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Ron and Sanne Higgins Family Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
wearable devices, seizure detection, epilepsy, research methodology standards, experimental design, data sharing, study population, data collection infrastructure, result reporting, research ethics policy, reproducibility
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Data Collection, Epilepsy, Humans, Research Design, Seizures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review