Cited by 86Research Data Management PracticesSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Citizen science and wildlife biology: Synergies and challenges

Open access
Frigerio, Didone, Pipek, Pavel, Kimmig, Sophia, Winter, Silvia, Melzheimer, Jörg, Diblíková, Lucie, Wachter, Bettina, Richter, Anett·2018·Ethology

Abstract

Citizen science (CS) has evolved over the past decades as a working method involving interested citizens in scientific research, for example by reporting observations, taking measurements or analysing data. In the past, research on animal behaviour has been benefitting from contributions of citizen scientists mainly in the field of ornithology but the full potential of CS in ecological and behavioural sciences is surely still untapped. Here, we present case studies that successfully applied CS to research projects in wildlife biology and discuss potentials and challenges experienced. Our case studies cover a broad range of opportunities: large‐scale CS projects with interactive online tools on bird song dialects, engagement of stakeholders as citizen scientists to reduce human–wildlife conflicts, involvement of students of primary and secondary schools in CS projects as well as collaboration with the media leading to successful recruitment of citizen scientists. Each case study provides a short overview of the scientific questions and how they were approached to showcase the potentials and challenges of CS in wildlife biology. Based on the experience of the case studies, we highlight how CS may support research in wildlife biology and emphasise the value of fostering communication in CS to improve recruitment of participants and to facilitate learning and mutual trust among different groups of interest (e.g., researchers, stakeholders, students). We further show how specific training for the participants may be needed to obtain reliable data. We consider CS as a suitable tool to enhance research in wildlife biology through the application of open science procedures (i.e., open access to articles and the data on publicly available repositories) to support transparency and sharing experiences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/eth.12746

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With good training and reputation systems, citizen-science efforts maintain data quality while building a sense of community ownership over biodiversity monitoring.

    “With good training and reputation systems, these efforts maintain data quality while building a sense of community ownership over biodiversity monitoring”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Hirschenhauser, K., Frigerio, D., & Neuböck-Hubinger, B. (2016). Wirkungen außerschulischer Angebote im Sachunterricht: Das Waldrapp-Projekt - Impact of external projects on teaching natural sciences in primary school: The Northern bald ibis case. In J. Klinkhardt (Ed.), Transfer Forschung-schule, band 2: Visible didactics fachdidaktische Forschung trifft Praxis (pp. 307-308). Bad Heilbrunn, Austria: Bad Heilbrunn.
  2. Richter, A., Dörler, D., Hecker, S., Heigl, F., Pettibone, L., Sanz, F. S., … Bonn, A. (in press). Capacity building in citizen science: Insights from strategic development programs in Europe. In S. Hecker, M. Haklay, A. Bowser, Z. Makuch, J. Vogel, & A. Bonn (Eds.), Citizen science Innovation in open science, society and policy (in press). London, UK: UCL Press.
  3. Rotman, D., Hammock, J., Preece, J., Hansen, D., Boston, C., Bowser, A. & He, Y. (2014). Motivations affecting initial and long-term participation in citizen science projects in three countries. Proceedings iConference , pp. 110-124.
  4. Singh, A., Drogaris, C., Nazarova, E., Blanchette, M., Waldispühl, J., Matin, A. I., … Tremblay-Savard, O. (2017). A human-computation platform for multi-scale genome analysis. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org). Retrieved from https:// www.humancomputation.com/2017/papers/100\_human-computation-platform.pdf
  5. Toomey, A. H., & Domroese, M. C. (2013). Can citizen science lead to positive conservation attitudes and behaviors? Human Ecology Review , 20 , 50-62.
  6. Ethology . 2018;124:365-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/ eth.12746

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frigerio, D., Pipek, P., Kimmig, S., Winter, S., Melzheimer, J., Diblíková, L., Wachter, B., & Richter, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
  • Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (DE)
  • BOKU University (AT)
  • Department of Evolutionary Ecology Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research Berlin Germany
  • Charles University (CZ)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Frigerio, Didone
Venue
Ethology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-19
Volume
124
Issue
6
Pages
365-377
ISSN
  • 0179-1613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-0310
OpenAlex
W2803006876
Cited by
86
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1
FWCI
14.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ethology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Phaidra (Universität Wien) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova (312213)
  • Akademie Věd České Republiky (RVO 68081766 to PP)
  • Universität Wien
  • Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Wirtschaft (SPA 03/005, SPA 05/026, SPA 05/098)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
citizen science, wildlife biology, animal behavior, human-wildlife conflict, school-based citizen science, media cooperation, participant recruitment, data reliability, open science, stakeholder engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review