Cited by 62Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenome Rearrangement AlgorithmsEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Rates of karyotypic evolution in Estrildid finches differ between island and continental clades: CHROMOSOME INVERSIONS IN FINCHES

Open access
Hooper, Daniel M., Price, Trevor D.·2015·Evolution

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Reasons why chromosomal rearrangements spread to fixation and frequently distinguish related taxa remain poorly understood. We used cytological descriptions of karyotype to identify large pericentric inversions between species of Estrildid finches (family Estrildidae) and a time-dated phylogeny to assess the genomic, geographic, and phylogenetic context of karyotype evolution in this group. Inversions between finch species fixed at an average rate of one every 2.26 My. Inversions were twice as likely to fix on the sex chromosomes compared to the autosomes. A high repeat density on the sex chromosomes may increase mutation rates, but other explanations via mutagenic input are not supported, as the number of inversions on a chromosome does not correlate with its length or map size. Inversions have fixed 3.3× faster in three continental clades than in two island chain clades, and fixation rate correlates with both range size and the number of sympatric species pairs. These results point to adaptation as the dominant mechanism driving fixation and suggest a role for gene flow in karyotype divergence. A review shows that the rapid karyotype evolution observed in the Estrildid finches appears to be more general across birds, and by implication other understudied taxa.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/evo.12633

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inversions bringing two pairs of loci into proximity occur at inversion rates ranging between 0.4 and 7 fixed inversions per million years in animal clades.

    “These changes are limited by other rearrangement mechanisms, like inversions bringing two pairs of loci into proximity to one another, occurring at inversion rates ranging between 0.4 and 7 fixed inversions per million years in animal clades (176–179).”

    From Topological Approaches in Animal Comparative Genomics (2026) · cites this paper as [178]

    The Results (section 319; page unavailable) report an average of one fixed pericentric inversion every 2.26 million years, about 0.44 per million years, and an example reaching 5.72 per million years in Australian grassfinches. The paper does not establish the stated 0.4–7 range across animal clades or show that these inversions brought two pairs of loci into proximity. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Serrano--Vela, I. 2009. Estrildinae Finches (Aves, Passeriformes) from Africa, South 562 Asia and Australia: a Molecular Phylogeographic Study. The Open Ornithology 563 Journal, 2, 29--36. 564
  2. Ayala FJ, & Coluzzi M. 2005. Chromosome speciation: Humans, Drosophila, and mosquitoes. 569 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:6535-42 570
  3. Castiglia, R. 2014. Sympatric sister species in rodents are more chromosomally 592 differentiated than allopatric ones: implications for the role of chromosomal 593 rearrangements in speciation. Mammal Review, 44: 1--4. 594
  4. -. 1987. Chromosomal evolution within the family Estrildidae Aves III. The Estrildae 606 waxbill finches. Genetica, 722: 93--100. 607 -.1990. Aves, Pages 116 in B. John, ed., Animal Cytogenetics. Berlin and Stuttgart, 608 Gebrüder Bornträger. 609
  5. Cole, C. T. 2003. Genetic variation in rare and common plants. Annual Review of Ecology, 610 Evolution, and Systematics, 213--237. 611
  6. Coyne, J. A., & Orr, H. A. 2004. Speciation (Vol. 37). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. 612
  7. Dobzhansky, T. 1951 Genetics and the origin of species (eds N. Eldredge & S. J. Gould), 3rd 624 edn. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. 625
  8. Ellegren, H. 2009. Genomic evidence for a large--Z effect. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: 635 Biological Sciences, 276: 361--366. 636 -. 2010. Evolutionary stasis: the stable chromosomes of birds. Trends in ecology & 637 evolution, 255: 283--291. 638
  9. -. 2013. The evolutionary genomics of birds. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and 639 Systematics, 44: 239--259. 640
  10. Grant, P. R., & Grant, B. R. 2011. How and why species multiply: the radiation of Darwin's 650 finches. Princeton University Press. 651
  11. Haldane, J., 1927 A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. Part V: selection 654 and mutation. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 3: 607-615. 655
  12. Jaenike, J. 2001. Sex chromosome meiotic drive. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 671 25--49. 672
  13. Kirkpatrick, M. 2010. How and why chromosome inversions evolve. PLoS biology, 8(9), 694 e1000501. 695
  14. Marshall, O. J., Chueh, A. C., Wong, L. H., & Choo, K. H. 2008. Neocentromeres: new insights 727 into centromere structure, disease development, and karyotype evolution. The 728 American Journal of Human Genetics, 82: 261--282. 729
  15. Nevo, E., Beiles, A., & Ben--Shlomo, R. 1984. The evolutionary significance of genetic 741 diversity: ecological, demographic and life history correlates (pp. 13--213). Springer 742 Berlin Heidelberg. 743
  16. Ohta, T. 1972. Population size and rate of evolution. Journal of molecular evolution, 1: 305-- 761 314. 762
  17. Ray--Chaudhuri, R. 1976. Cytotaxonomy and chromosome evolution in Passeriformes 779 (Ayes). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 14: 299--320.
  18. Shields, G. F. 1982. Comparative avian cytogenetics: a review. Condor, 45--58. 783
  19. Wesley, C. S., & Eanes, W. F. 1994. Isolation and analysis of the breakpoint sequences of 812 chromosome inversion In (3L) Payne in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of 813 the National Academy of Sciences, 91: 3132--3136. 814
  20. Yan, L., Liqing, Z., Dexiang, Z., Xiquan, Z., & Xuemei, L. 2010. Faster evolution of Z--linked 820 duplicate genes in chicken. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 37: 695--702. 821

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hooper, D. M., & Price, T. D.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Hooper, Daniel M.
Venue
Evolution
Published
2015-04
Volume
69
Issue
4
Pages
890-903
ISSN
0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950897230
Cited by
62
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4
FWCI
11.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
karyotype evolution, Estrildidae, pericentric inversion, chromosomal rearrangements, sex chromosomes, range size, sympatric species pairs, gene flow, adaptation, avian cytogenetics
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Geography, Phylogeny, Sex Chromosomes, Finches, Gene Flow, Karyotype, Islands

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review