Cited by 84Plant Diversity and EvolutionChromosomal and Genetic VariationsPlant Reproductive Biology

Multiple reproductive barriers separate recently diverged sunflower ecotypes: REPRODUCTIVE BARRIERS BETWEEN SUNFLOWER ECOTYPES

Ostevik, Katherine L., Andrew, Rose L., Otto, Sarah P., Rieseberg, Loren H.·2016·Evolution

Abstract

Measuring reproductive barriers between groups of organisms is an effective way to determine the traits and mechanisms that impede gene flow. However, to understand the ecological and evolutionary factors that drive speciation, it is important to distinguish between the barriers that arise early in the speciation process and those that arise after speciation is largely complete. In this article, we comprehensively test for reproductive isolation between recently diverged (<10,000 years bp) dune and nondune ecotypes of the prairie sunflower, Helianthus petiolaris. We find reproductive barriers acting at multiple stages of hybridization, including premating, postmating-prezygotic, and postzygotic barriers, despite the recent divergence. Barriers include extrinsic selection against immigrants and hybrids, a shift in pollinator assemblage, and postpollination assortative mating. Together, these data suggest that multiple barriers can be important for reducing gene flow in the earliest stages of speciation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/evo.13027

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Examples include the origin of dune sunflower ecotypes in the southwestern US, in which traits associated with dune adaptation and RI map to inversions that are old and pre-date ecotype divergence.

    “Examples include the origin of dune sunflower ecotypes in the southwestern US, in which traits associated with dune adaptation and RI map to inversions, which are old and pre-date ecotype divergence (Ostevik et al., 2016; Huang and Rieseberg, 2020; Todesco et al., 2020).”

    From Genomics of plant speciation (2023) · cites this paper as Ostevik et al., 2016

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ostevik, K. L., Andrew, R. L., Otto, S. P., & Rieseberg, L. H.
Affiliations
  • Department of Botany; University of British Columbia; Vancouver British Columbia Canada
  • University of New England (AU)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Evolution
Published
2016-08-24
Volume
70
Issue
10
Pages
2322-2335
ISSN
0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2481960629
Cited by
84
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
11.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EPubDev Repository (submittedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NSERC Postgraduate Scholarship
  • NSERC Discovery Grants (327475, 183611)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant Reproductive Biology
Keywords
reproductive isolation, speciation, Helianthus petiolaris, hybridization, postzygotic barriers, pollinator assemblages, assortative mating, gene flow, hybrid sterility
MeSH terms
Helianthus, Hybridization, Genetic, Selection, Genetic, Genetic Speciation, Pollination, Reproductive Isolation, Ecotype

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review