A deep learning algorithm to detect cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma on frozen sections in Mohs micrographic surgery: A retrospective assessment
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Importance Intraoperative margin analysis is crucial for the successful removal of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCC). Artificial intelligence technologies (AI) have previously demonstrated potential for facilitating rapid and complete tumor removal using intraoperative margin assessment for basal cell carcinoma. However, the varied morphologies of cSCC present challenges for AI margin assessment. Objective To develop and evaluate the accuracy of an AI algorithm for real-time histologic margin analysis of cSCC. Design A retrospective cohort study was conducted using frozen cSCC section slides and adjacent tissues. Setting This study was conducted in a tertiary care academic center. Participants Patients undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery for cSCC between January and March 2020. Exposures Frozen section slides were scanned and annotated, delineating benign tissue structures, inflammation, and tumor to develop an AI algorithm for real-time margin analysis. Patients were stratified by tumor differentiation status. Epithelial tissues including epidermis and hair follicles were annotated for moderate-well to well differentiated cSCC tumors. A convolutional neural network workflow was used to extract histomorphological features predictive of cSCC at 50-micron resolution. Main Outcomes and Measures The performance of the AI algorithm in identifying cSCC at 50-micron resolution was reported using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Accuracy was also reported by tumor differentiation status and by delineation of cSCC from epidermis. Model performance using histomorphological features alone was compared to architectural features (i.e., tissue context) for well-differentiated tumors. Results The AI algorithm demonstrated proof of concept for identifying cSCC with high accuracy. Accuracy differed by differentiation status, driven by challenges in separating cSCC from epidermis using histomorphological features alone for well-differentiated tumors. Consideration of broader tissue context through architectural features improved the ability to delineate tumor from epidermis. Conclusions and Relevance Incorporating AI into the surgical workflow may improve efficiency and completeness of real-time margin assessment for cSCC removal, particularly in cases of moderately and poorly differentiated tumors/neoplasms. Further algorithmic improvement is necessary to remain sensitive to the unique epidermal landscape of well-differentiated tumors, and to map tumors to their original anatomical position/orientation. Future studies should assess the efficiency improvements and cost benefits and address other confounding pathologies such as inflammation and nuclei. Funding sources JL is supported by NIH grants R24GM141194, P20GM104416 and P20GM130454. Support for this work was also provided by the Prouty Dartmouth Cancer Center development funds. Key Points Question How can the efficiency and accuracy of real-time intraoperative margin analysis for the removal of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) be improved, and how can tumor differentiation be incorporated into this approach? Findings A proof-of-concept deep learning algorithm was trained, validated, and tested on frozen section whole slide images (WSI) for a retrospective cohort of cSCC cases, demonstrating high accuracy in identifying cSCC and related pathologies. Histomorphology alone was found to be insufficient to delineate tumor from epidermis in histologic identification of well-differentiated cSCC. Incorporation of surrounding tissue architecture and shape improved the ability to delineate tumor from normal tissue. Meaning Integrating artificial intelligence into surgical procedures has the potential to enhance the thoroughness and efficiency of intraoperative margin analysis for cSCC removal. However, accurately accounting for the epidermal tissue based on the tumor’s differentiation status requires specialized algorithms that consider the surrounding tissue context. To meaningfully integrate AI algorithms into clinical practice, further algorithmic refinement is needed, as well as the mapping of tumors to their original surgical site, and evaluation of the cost and efficacy of these approaches to address existing bottlenecks.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A deep learning algorithm to detect cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma on frozen sections during Mohs micrographic surgery showed good accuracy for moderate to poorly differentiated cSCC but struggled with well-differentiated cases.
“The model showed good accuracy for moderate to poorly differentiated cSCC but struggled with well-differentiated cases, highlighting the need to integrate tissue architecture for improved performance in real-time margin assessment.”
From Artificial Intelligence in Dermatopathology: An Update and Review of the Current Literature (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126 · see citing works
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.01703 · Cited by 31,473 · see citing works
Digital pathology and artificial intelligence
Niazi, M. K. K., Parwani, A. V., & Gurcan, M. N. (2019) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30154-8 · Cited by 1,232 · see citing works
Incidence Estimate of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer in the United States, 2006
Rogers, H. W., Weinstock, M. A., Harris, A. R., Hinckley, M. R., Feldman, S. R., Fleischer, A. B., & Coldiron, B. M. (2010) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2010.19 · Cited by 1,186 · see citing works
Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare
Li, M. M., Huang, K., & Zitnik, M. (2022) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-022-00942-x · Cited by 294 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A convolutional neural network (CNN) workflow was used to extract histomorphological features predictive of cSCC at 50-micron resolution, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was used to assess model performance.”
MethodSurvival of Patients with Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Prospective Cohort Study
Eigentler, T., Leiter, U., Häfner, H., Garbe, C., Röcken, M., & Breuninger, H. (2017) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2017.06.025 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Developing a delivery science for artificial intelligence in healthcare
Li, R. C., Asch, S., & Shah, N. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00318-y · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Histologic Subtyping and Malignancy Assessment of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Petter, G., & Haustein, U. (2000) · Dermatologic Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1524-4725.2000.99181.x · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Mohs Micrographic Surgery vs Traditional Surgical Excision
Bialy, T. L., Whalen, J. D., Veledar, E., Lafreniere, D. C., Spiro, J. D., Chartier, T. K., & Chen, S. C. (2004) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.140.6.736 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Self-citationTopological Feature Extraction and Visualization of Whole Slide Images using Graph Neural NetworksPreprint
Levy, J. J., Haudenschild, C., Barwick, C., Christensen, B., & Vaickus, L. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.08.01.231639 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationTopological Feature Extraction and Visualization of Whole Slide Images using Graph Neural Networks
Levy, J., Haudenschild, C., Barwick, C., Christensen, B. C., & Vaickus, L. J. (2020) · Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (PSB) · doi:10.1142/9789811232701_0027 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationgiotto-tda: A Topological Data Analysis Toolkit for Machine Learning and Data Exploration
Tauzin, G., Lupo, U., Tunstall, L., et al. (2020) · ArODES (HES-SO (https://www.hes-so.ch/)) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.02551 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Malciu, A. M., Lupu, M., & Voiculescu, V. M. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11020429 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Leitenberger, J. J., Rogers, H. W., Chapman, J., Maher, I. A., Fox, M. C., Harmon, C., Bailey, E. C., Odland, P. B., Wysong, A. S., Johnson, T., et al. (2016) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.06.047 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Campanella, G. S. V., Nehal, K. S., Lee, E. H., Rossi, A., Possum, B., Manuel, G., Fuchs, T. J., & BUSAM, K. J. (2020) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.09.012 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Sohn, G. K., Sohn, J. H., Yeh, J., Chen, Y., & Jiang, S. I. B. (2020) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.080 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence and frozen section histopathology: A systematic review
Gorman, B. G., Lifson, M. A., & Vidal, N. Y. (2023) · Journal of Cutaneous Pathology · doi:10.1111/cup.14481 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Mohs surgery: efficient and effective
Otley, C. C. (2004) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.047068 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Chacko, R. S., Davis, M. J., Levy, J., & LeBoeuf, M. R. (2024) · JAAD International · doi:10.1016/j.jdin.2024.02.014 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationMurphree, D. H., Kim, Y.-H., Sidey, K., et al. (2023) · Clinical and Experimental Dermatology · doi:10.1093/ced/llad209 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Mohs micrographic surgery for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Motley, R., & Arron, S. T. (2019) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.18161 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Levy, J., Davis, M. A., Chacko, R. S., Davis, M., Fu, L., Goel, T., Pamal, A., Nafi, I., Angirekula, A., Christensen, B. C., et al. (2022) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.05.06.22274781 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial Intelligence in Dermatopathology: An Update and Review of the Current Literature
Abu-Dayeh, A., Cazzato, G., & Giubellino, A. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16111702 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Researchers scanned and annotated slides to distinguish between tumor, benign structures, and inflammation and then trained a CNN to extract histomorphological features associated with cSCC [27].”
- Authors
- Davis, M. J., Srinivasan, G., Chacko, R., Chen, S., Suvarna, A., Vaickus, L. J., Torres, V. C., Hodge, S., Chen, E. Y., Preum, S., Samkoe, K. S., Christensen, B. C., LeBoeuf, M. R., & Levy, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Caddo Parish Magnet High School Shreveport Louisiana USA
- Thomas Jefferson School for Science and Technology Alexandria Virginia USA
- Corresponding author
- Davis, Matthew J.
- Levy, Joshua J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Experimental Dermatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-10-21
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e14949-e14949
- ISSN
- 0906-6705 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0625
- PMC
- PMC10246018
- OpenAlex
- W4387840704
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 1.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Experimental Dermatology (publishedVersion)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (P20GM104416, P20GM130454)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
- Keywords
- cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, Mohs micrographic surgery, intraoperative margin assessment, frozen section histology, convolutional neural networks, artificial intelligence in dermatology, well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review