Whither Famology? Department Name Trends Across Four Decades
Abstract
Inconsistent naming of academic departments has been a cause and symptom of an identity issue that has persisted in the family field for decades. Department name trends were examined across nearly four decades to consider whether the family field is beginning to converge on a common label. Results indicate that the problem persists – 103 different names existed among 217 academic units examined – but that convergence seems to be on two terms: family studies and family science. A survey of 752 faculty members in those academic units found that 78% believed the variation in department names within the family field was somewhat or very problematic. Discussion and implications center on key issues for understanding and addressing the problem.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The discipline is moving away from calling itself family studies toward family science because of the emphasis on scientific foundations.
“The emphasis on the scientific foundations of the discipline is also the reason that the discipline is moving away from calling itself “family studies” toward “family science” (Hans, 2014).”
From Lessons from the field: Isn't it just common sense? Naïve realism as a barrier to learning (2024) · cites this paper as Hans, 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lessons from the field: Isn't it just common sense? Naïve realism as a barrier to learning
Dyer, K. D. (2024) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.12967 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hans, J. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hans, Jason D.
- ORCID
- Hans, Jason D.
- Venue
- Family Relations
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-06-04
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 323-332
- ISSN
- 0197-6664 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3729
- OpenAlex
- W1956596513
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 43.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Family Relations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Architecture, Design, and Social History
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Education, Sociology, Communication Studies
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- family studies, family science, disciplinary identity, teacher perceptions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review