Cited by 39Reproductive tract infections researchMicrobial infections and disease researchImmune Response and Inflammation

Interaction of Chlamydiae with human macrophages

Herweg, Jo‐Ana, Rudel, Thomas·2016·The FEBS Journal

Abstract

The phylum Chlamydiae contains several members that are well‐known human pathogens, like Chlamydia trachomatis and C. pneumoniae. Establishing a chronic bacterial infection requires the active evasion of the host immune response. A major arm of the innate immune defence is constituted by macrophages, which fight infections by removing bacteria and triggering an adaptive immune response. However, some pathogenic Chlamydia infect and survive in macrophages at least for a certain period of time. Therefore, macrophages can serve as vehicles for the dissemination of bacterial infections from the primary infection site via the urogenital or respiratory tract to distant sites in the body. The capacity to infect macrophages seems to depend on the chlamydial strain and the source of macrophages. In vitro infections of macrophages with C. trachomatis, C. psittaci and C. pneumoniae reveal low efficiency of infection and progeny formation, as well as failure to develop mature inclusions. In contrast, the emerging pathogen, Simkania negevensis, actively replicates in macrophages. Here we summarize the current knowledge of the intracellular and molecular key mechanisms of C. trachomatis, C. pneumoniae and S. negevensis infections in human macrophages.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/febs.13609

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 17424658, 2016, 4, Downloaded from https://febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/febs.13609, Wiley Online Library on [02/11/2026]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herweg, J., & Rudel, T.
Affiliations
University of Würzburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Rudel, Thomas
Venue
The FEBS Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-12-24
Volume
283
Issue
4
Pages
608-618
ISSN
  • 1742-464X (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-4658
OpenAlex
W2172727267
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • FEBS Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SPP 1580 RU631/9‐1, RU631/9‐2)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
Keywords
Chlamydiae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Chlamydia psittaci, Simkania negevensis, human macrophages, intracellular bacterial infection, host immune evasion, bacterial dissemination, inclusion formation, host-pathogen interaction, innate immunity
MeSH terms
Chlamydia, Chlamydia Infections, Humans, Macrophages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review