The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross‐species systems analysis of evolutionary toolkits of neurogenomic response to social challenge
Published version of a preprint
Abstract
Social challenges like territorial intrusions evoke behavioral responses in widely diverging species. Recent work has showed that evolutionary “toolkits”—genes and modules with lineage‐specific variations but deep conservation of function—participate in the behavioral response to social challenge. Here, we develop a multispecies computational‐experimental approach to characterize such a toolkit at a systems level. Brain transcriptomic responses to social challenge was probed via RNA‐seq profiling in three diverged species—honey bees, mice and three‐spined stickleback fish—following a common methodology, allowing fair comparisons across species. Data were collected from multiple brain regions and multiple time points after social challenge exposure, achieving anatomical and temporal resolution substantially greater than previous work. We developed statistically rigorous analyses equipped to find homologous functional groups among these species at the levels of individual genes, functional and coexpressed gene modules, and transcription factor subnetworks. We identified six orthogroups involved in response to social challenge, including groups represented by mouse genes Npas4 and Nr4a1 , as well as common modulation of systems such as transcriptional regulators, ion channels, G‐protein‐coupled receptors and synaptic proteins. We also identified conserved coexpression modules enriched for mitochondrial fatty acid metabolism and heat shock that constitute the shared neurogenomic response. Our analysis suggests a toolkit wherein nuclear receptors, interacting with chaperones, induce transcriptional changes in mitochondrial activity, neural cytoarchitecture and synaptic transmission after social challenge. It shows systems‐level mechanisms that have been repeatedly co‐opted during evolution of analogous behaviors, thus advancing the genetic toolkit concept beyond individual genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, bGRNs and associated coexpression modules provide glimpses of shared mechanisms of behavior in different species even if such evolutionary toolkits are not apparent at the individual gene level (9, 41).”
From Behavior-related gene regulatory networks: A new level of organization in the brain (2020) · cites this paper as [41]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J., & Smyth, G. K. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · Cited by 41,364
WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis
Langfelder, P., & Horvath, S. (2008) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-559 · Cited by 27,252
An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome
The ENCODE Project Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11247 · Cited by 18,072
Modularity and community structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601602103 · Cited by 12,256
Efron, B., Hastie, T., Johnstone, I., & Tibshirani, R. (2004) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053604000000067 · Cited by 9,357
HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching
Finn, R. D., Clements, J., & Eddy, S. R. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr367 · Cited by 5,952
Hsp70 chaperones: Cellular functions and molecular mechanism
Mayer, M. P., & Bukau, B. (2005) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-004-4464-6 · Cited by 2,987
Widespread transcription at neuronal activity-regulated enhancers
Kim, T.-K., Hemberg, M., Gray, J. M., Costa, A. M., Bear, D. M., Wu, J., Harmin, D. A., Laptewicz, M., Barbara-Haley, K., Kuersten, S., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09033 · Cited by 2,450
Margolin, A. A., Nemenman, I., Basso, K., Wiggins, C., Stolovitzky, G., Favera, R. D., & Califano, A. (2006) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-s1-s7 · Cited by 2,420
A Gene-Coexpression Network for Global Discovery of Conserved Genetic Modules
Stuart, J. M., Segal, E., Koller, D., & Kim, S. K. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1087447 · Cited by 2,282
Cited by
Behavior-related gene regulatory networks: A new level of organization in the brain
Sinha, S., Jones, B. M., Traniello, I. M., Bukhari, S. A., Halfon, M. S., Hofmann, H. A., Huang, S., Katz, P. S., Keagy, J., Lynch, V. J., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1921625117 · Cited by 85
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Saul, M. C., Blatti, C., Yang, W., Bukhari, S. A., Shpigler, H. Y., Troy, J. M., Seward, C. H., Sloofman, L., Chandrasekaran, S., Bell, A. M., Stubbs, L., Robinson, G. E., Zhao, S. D., & Sinha, S.
- Affiliations
- Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois
- Biomedical Engineering University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan
- ORCID
- Shpigler, Hagai Y.
- Venue
- Genes, Brain and Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-07-16
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1601-1848
- 1601-183X
- PMC
- PMC6314924
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 67
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- Division of Mathematical Sciences (DMS‐1613005)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1U54GM114838)
- Simons Foundation (SFLife 291812)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.