Habitat traits and food availability determine the response of marine invertebrates to ocean acidification
Abstract
Energy availability and local adaptation are major components in mediating the effects of ocean acidification (OA) on marine species. In a long‐term study, we investigated the effects of food availability and elevated p CO2 (ca. 400, 1000 and 3000 μatm) on growth of newly settled Amphibalanus (Balanus) improvisus to reproduction, and on their offspring. We also compared two different populations, which were presumed to differ in their sensitivity to p CO2 due to differing habitat conditions: Kiel Fjord, Germany (Western Baltic Sea) with naturally strong p CO2 fluctuations, and the Tjärnö Archipelago, Sweden (Skagerrak) with far lower fluctuations. Over 20 weeks, survival, growth, reproduction and shell strength of Kiel barnacles were all unaffected by elevated p CO2, regardless of food availability. Moulting frequency and shell corrosion increased with increasing p CO2 in adults. Larval development and juvenile growth of the F1 generation were tolerant to increased p CO2, irrespective of parental treatment. In contrast, elevated p CO2 had a strong negative impact on survival of Tjärnö barnacles. Specimens from this population were able to withstand moderate levels of elevated p CO2 over 5 weeks when food was plentiful but showed reduced growth under food limitation. Severe levels of elevated p CO2 negatively impacted growth of Tjärnö barnacles in both food treatments. We demonstrate a conspicuously higher tolerance to elevated p CO2 in Kiel barnacles than in Tjärnö barnacles. This tolerance was carried over from adults to their offspring. Our findings indicate that populations from fluctuating p CO2 environments are more tolerant to elevated p CO2 than populations from more stable p CO2 habitats. We furthermore provide evidence that energy availability can mediate the ability of barnacles to withstand moderate CO2 stress. Considering the high tolerance of Kiel specimens and the possibility to adapt over many generations, near future OA alone does not seem to present a major threat for A. improvisus.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Marine organisms are often more susceptible to ocean acidification when food is limited.
“Marine organisms are often more susceptible to ocean acidification when food is limited (Thomsen et al., 2013;Pansch et al., 2014;Ramajo et al., 2016;Gobler et al., 2018).”
From Harmful algal blooms: A climate change co-stressor in marine and freshwater ecosystems (2020) · cites this paper as Pansch et al., 2014
Cites
Kroeker, K. J., Kordas, R. L., Crim, R., Hendriks, I. E., Ramajo, L., Singh, G. S., Duarte, C. M., & Gattuso, J. (2013) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12179 · Cited by 2,298 · see citing works
Meta-analysis reveals negative yet variable effects of ocean acidification on marine organisms
Kroeker, K. J., Kordas, R. L., Crim, R. N., & Singh, G. G. (2010) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01518.x · Cited by 1,621 · see citing works
Volcanic carbon dioxide vents show ecosystem effects of ocean acidification
Hall-Spencer, J. M., Rodolfo-Metalpa, R., Martin, S., Ransome, E., Fine, M., Turner, S. M., Rowley, S. J., Tedesco, D., & Buia, M.-C. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07051 · Cited by 1,359 · see citing works
Impact of elevated CO<sub>2</sub> on shellfish calcification
Gazeau, F., Quiblier, C., Jansen, J. M., Gattuso, J., Middelburg, J. J., & Heip, C. H. R. (2007) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2006gl028554 · Cited by 759 · see citing works
Thomsen, J., Gutowska, M. A., Saphörster, J., Heinemann, A., Trübenbach, K., Fietzke, J., Hiebenthal, C., Eisenhauer, A., Körtzinger, A., Wahl, M., et al. (2010) · doi:10.5194/bgd-7-5119-2010 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Self-citationFindlay, H. S., Burrows, M. T., Kendall, M. A., Spicer, J. I., & Widdicombe, S. (2010) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/09-1987.1 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Harmful algal blooms: A climate change co-stressor in marine and freshwater ecosystems
Griffith, A. W., & Gobler, C. J. (2020) · Harmful Algae · doi:10.1016/j.hal.2019.03.008 · Cited by 598 · see citing works
DePasquale, E., Baumann, H., & Gobler, C. (2015) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps11142 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pansch, C., Schaub, I., Havenhand, J., & Wahl, M.
- Affiliations
- GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (DE)
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-01-20
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 765-777
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2097327268
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 7.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- FP7 Research infrastructures
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
- Keywords
- ocean acidification, Amphibalanus improvisus, barnacles, food availability, elevated pCO2, local adaptation, larval development, juvenile growth, moulting frequency, energy availability, Kiel Fjord, Baltic Sea, Skagerrak
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Carbon Dioxide, Crustacea, Food, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Larva, Oceans and Seas, Reproduction, Seawater, Ecosystem, Molting, Animal Shells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review