The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Large‐scale patterns in summer diffusive CH4 fluxes across boreal lakes, and contribution to diffusive C emissions
Abstract
Lakes are a major component of boreal landscapes, and whereas lake CO2 emissions are recognized as a major component of regional C budgets, there is still much uncertainty associated to lake CH4 fluxes. Here, we present a large‐scale study of the magnitude and regulation of boreal lake summer diffusive CH4 fluxes, and their contribution to total lake carbon (C) emissions, based on in situ measurements of concentration and fluxes of CH4 and CO2 in 224 lakes across a wide range of lake type and environmental gradients in Québec. The diffusive CH4 flux was highly variable (mean 11.6 ± 26.4 SD mg m−2 d−1), and it was positively correlated with temperature and lake nutrient status, and negatively correlated with lake area and colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM). The relationship between CH4 and CO2 concentrations fluxes was weak, suggesting major differences in their respective sources and/or regulation. For example, increasing water temperature leads to higher CH4 flux but does not significantly affect CO2 flux, whereas increasing CDOM concentration leads to higher CO2 flux but lower CH4 flux. CH4 contributed to 8 ± 23% to the total lake C emissions (CH4 + CO2), but 18 ± 25% to the total flux in terms of atmospheric warming potential, expressed as CO2‐equivalents. The incorporation of ebullition and plant‐mediated CH4 fluxes would further increase the importance of lake CH4. The average Q 10 of CH4 flux was 3.7, once other covarying factors were accounted for, but this apparent Q 10 varied with lake morphometry and was higher for shallow lakes. We conclude that global climate change and the resulting shifts in temperature will strongly influence lake CH4 fluxes across the boreal biome, but these climate effects may be altered by regional patterns in lake morphometry, nutrient status, and browning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean
Wanninkhof, R. (1992) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/92jc00188 · Cited by 4,737
Methane production and methane consumption: a review of processes underlying wetland methane fluxes
Segers, R. (1998) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1005929032764 · Cited by 907
Cited by
DelSontro, T., Boutet, L., St‐Pierre, A., del Giorgio, P. A., & Prairie, Y. T. (2016) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.1002/lno.10335 · Cited by 316
Self-citationNiño-García, J. P., Ruiz-González, C., & del Giorgio, P. A. (2016) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2015.226 · Cited by 257
Self-citationDrivers of Methane Flux Differ Between Lakes and Reservoirs, Complicating Global Upscaling Efforts
Deemer, B. R., & Holgerson, M. A. (2021) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences · doi:10.1029/2019jg005600 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Rasilo, T., Prairie, Y. T., & del Giorgio, P. A.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10-18
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1124-1139
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2130260950
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large‐scale patterns in summer diffusive CH4 fluxes across boreal lakes, and contribution to diffusive C emissions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/gcb.12741
- The paper
- Rasilo, T., Prairie, Y. T., & del Giorgio, P. A. (2015). Large‐scale patterns in summer diffusive CH4 fluxes across boreal lakes, and contribution to diffusive C emissions. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12741
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.