The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How inhibiting nitrification affects nitrogen cycle and reduces environmental impacts of anthropogenic nitrogen input
Abstract
Anthropogenic activities, and in particular the use of synthetic nitrogen (N) fertilizer, have doubled global annual reactive N inputs in the past 50–100 years, causing deleterious effects on the environment through increased N leaching and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) and ammonia (NH3) emissions. Leaching and gaseous losses of N are greatly controlled by the net rate of microbial nitrification. Extensive experiments have been conducted to develop ways to inhibit this process through use of nitrification inhibitors (NI) in combination with fertilizers. Yet, no study has comprehensively assessed how inhibiting nitrification affects both hydrologic and gaseous losses of N and plant nitrogen use efficiency. We synthesized the results of 62 NI field studies and evaluated how NI application altered N cycle and ecosystem services in N‐enriched systems. Our results showed that inhibiting nitrification by NI application increased NH3 emission (mean: 20%, 95% confidential interval: 33–67%), but reduced dissolved inorganic N leaching (−48%, −56% to −38%), N 2 O emission (−44%, −48% to −39%) and NO emission (−24%, −38% to −8%). This amounted to a net reduction of 16.5% in the total N release to the environment. Inhibiting nitrification also increased plant N recovery (58%, 34–93%) and productivity of grain (9%, 6–13%), straw (15%, 12–18%), vegetable (5%, 0–10%) and pasture hay (14%, 8–20%). The cost and benefit analysis showed that the economic benefit of reducing N's environmental impacts offsets the cost of NI application. Applying NI along with N fertilizer could bring additional revenues of $163 ha−1 yr−1 for a maize farm, equivalent to 8.95% increase in revenues. Our findings showed that NI s could create a win‐win scenario that reduces the negative impact of N leaching and greenhouse gas production, while increases the agricultural output. However, NI's potential negative impacts, such as increase in NH3 emission and the risk of NI contamination, should be fully considered before large‐scale application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A safe operating space for humanity
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/461472a · Cited by 13,333
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. B
Press, H. (1886) · Cited by 10,080
Transformation of the Nitrogen Cycle: Recent Trends, Questions, and Potential Solutions
Galloway, J. N., Townsend, A. R., Erisman, J. W., Bekunda, M., Cai, Z., Freney, J. R., Martinelli, L. A., Seitzinger, S. P., & Sutton, M. A. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1136674 · Cited by 6,995
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704
Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems
Ju, X.-T., Xing, G.-X., Chen, X.-P., Zhang, S.-L., Zhang, L.-J., Liu, X.-J., Cui, Z.-L., Yin, B., Christie, P., Zhu, Z.-L., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0813417106 · Cited by 2,599
Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis
Sterne, J. A. C., Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7304.101 · Cited by 2,225
The global nitrogen cycle in the twenty-first century
Fowler, D., Coyle, M., Skiba, U., Sutton, M. A., Cape, J. N., Reis, S., Sheppard, L. J., Jenkins, A., Grizzetti, B., Galloway, J. N., et al. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0164 · Cited by 2,074
Climate change 2014 : mitigation of climate change
Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., & Sokona, Y. (2014) · University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · Cited by 1,637
The European Nitrogen Assessment: Sources, Effects and Policy Perspectives
(2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976988 · Cited by 1,278
Nitrogen in crop production: An account of global flows
Smil, V. (1999) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/1999gb900015 · Cited by 986
Cited by
Nitrogen transformations in modern agriculture and the role of biological nitrification inhibition
Coskun, D., Britto, D. T., Shi, W., & Kronzucker, H. J. (2017) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/nplants.2017.74 · Cited by 731
Xia, L., Lam, S. K., Chen, D., Wang, J., Tang, Q., & Yan, X. (2017) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13455 · Cited by 507
Current status and environment impact of direct straw return in China’s cropland – A review
Li, H., Dai, M., Dai, S., & Dong, X. (2018) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.05.014 · Cited by 459
Controls and Adaptive Management of Nitrification in Agricultural Soils
Norton, J., & Ouyang, Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01931 · Cited by 404
(2019) · doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2019.01.007 · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Qiao, C., Liu, L., Hu, S., Compton, J. E., Greaver, T. L., & Li, Q.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-01-08
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1249-1257
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2107657648
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 20.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How inhibiting nitrification affects nitrogen cycle and reduces environmental impacts of anthropogenic nitrogen input. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/gcb.12802
- The paper
- Qiao, C., Liu, L., Hu, S., Compton, J. E., Greaver, T. L., & Li, Q. (2015). How inhibiting nitrification affects nitrogen cycle and reduces environmental impacts of anthropogenic nitrogen input. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12802
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.