Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The linkages between photosynthesis, productivity, growth and biomass in lowland Amazonian forests

Malhi, Yadvinder, Doughty, Christopher E., Goldsmith, Gregory R., Metcalfe, Daniel B., Girardin, Cécile A. J., Marthews, Toby R., del Aguila‐Pasquel, Jhon, Aragão, Luiz E. O. C., Araujo‐Murakami, Alejandro, Brando, Paulo, da Costa, Antonio C. L., Silva‐Espejo, Javier E., Farfán Amézquita, Filio, Galbraith, David R., Quesada, Carlos A., Rocha, Wanderley, Salinas‐Revilla, Norma, Silvério, Divino, Meir, Patrick, Phillips, Oliver L.·2015·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between photosynthesis, net primary productivity and growth in forest ecosystems is key to understanding how these ecosystems will respond to global anthropogenic change, yet the linkages among these components are rarely explored in detail. We provide the first comprehensive description of the productivity, respiration and carbon allocation of contrasting lowland Amazonian forests spanning gradients in seasonal water deficit and soil fertility. Using the largest data set assembled to date, ten sites in three countries all studied with a standardized methodology, we find that (i) gross primary productivity (GPP) has a simple relationship with seasonal water deficit, but that (ii) site‐to‐site variations in GPP have little power in explaining site‐to‐site spatial variations in net primary productivity (NPP) or growth because of concomitant changes in carbon use efficiency (CUE), and conversely, the woody growth rate of a tropical forest is a very poor proxy for its productivity. Moreover, (iii) spatial patterns of biomass are much more driven by patterns of residence times (i.e. tree mortality rates) than by spatial variation in productivity or tree growth. Current theory and models of tropical forest carbon cycling under projected scenarios of global atmospheric change can benefit from advancing beyond a focus on GPP. By improving our understanding of poorly understood processes such as CUE, NPP allocation and biomass turnover times, we can provide more complete and mechanistic approaches to linking climate and tropical forest carbon cycling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcb.12859

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 189

Metadata

Authors
Malhi, Y., Doughty, C. E., Goldsmith, G. R., Metcalfe, D. B., Girardin, C. A. J., Marthews, T. R., del Aguila‐Pasquel, J., Aragão, L. E. O. C., Araujo‐Murakami, A., Brando, P., da Costa, A. C. L., Silva‐Espejo, J. E., Farfán Amézquita, F., Galbraith, D. R., Quesada, C. A., Rocha, W., Salinas‐Revilla, N., Silvério, D., Meir, P., & Phillips, O. L.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-20
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
2283-2295
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2146490878
Cited by
189
References
0
FWCI
18.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The linkages between photosynthesis, productivity, growth and biomass in lowland Amazonian forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/gcb.12859
The paper
Malhi, Y., Doughty, C. E., Goldsmith, G. R., Metcalfe, D. B., Girardin, C. A. J., Marthews, T. R., del Aguila‐Pasquel, J., Aragão, L. E. O. C., Araujo‐Murakami, A., Brando, P., da Costa, A. C. L., Silva‐Espejo, J. E., Farfán Amézquita, F., Galbraith, D. R., Quesada, C. A., Rocha, W., Salinas‐Revilla, N., Silvério, D., Meir, P., & Phillips, O. L. (2015). The linkages between photosynthesis, productivity, growth and biomass in lowland Amazonian forests. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12859

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.