The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The decadal state of the terrestrial carbon cycle: Global retrievals of terrestrial carbon allocation, pools, and residence times
Open accessAbstract
Significance: Quantitative knowledge of terrestrial carbon pathways and processes is fundamental for understanding the biosphere’s response to a changing climate. Carbon allocation, stocks, and residence times together define the dynamic state of the terrestrial carbon cycle. These quantities are difficult to measure and remain poorly quantified on a global scale. Here, we retrieve global 1° × 1° carbon state and process variables by combining a carbon balance model with satellite observations of biomass and leaf area (where and when available) and global soil carbon data. Our results reveal emergent continental-scale patterns and relationships between carbon states and processes. We find that conventional land cover types cannot capture continental-scale variations of retrieved carbon variables; this mismatch has strong implications for terrestrial carbon cycle predictions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
Baldocchi, D., Falge, E. M., Gu, L., Olson, R., Hollinger, D. Y., Running, S. W., Anthoni, P. M., Bernhofer, C., Davis, K. J., Evans, R., et al. (2001) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<2415:fantts>2.3.co;2 · Cited by 3,787
The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Mission
Entekhabi, D., Njoku, E. G., O'Neill, P. E., Kellogg, K. H., Crow, W. T., Edelstein, W. N., Entin, J. K., Goodman, S. D., Jackson, T. J., Johnson, J., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2010.2043918 · Cited by 3,754
(2010) · doi:10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010 · Cited by 2,859
Terrestrial Gross Carbon Dioxide Uptake: Global Distribution and Covariation with Climate
Beer, C., Reichstein, M., Tomelleri, E., Ciais, P., Jung, M., Carvalhais, N., Rödenbeck, C., Arain, M. A., Baldocchi, D., Bonan, G. B., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1184984 · Cited by 2,831
TRY – a global database of plant traits
KATTGE, J., DÍAZ, S., LAVOREL, S., PRENTICE, I. C., LEADLEY, P., BÖNISCH, G., GARNIER, E., WESTOBY, M., REICH, P. B., WRIGHT, I. J., et al. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02451.x · Cited by 2,638
Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents
Saatchi, S. S., Harris, N. L., Brown, S., Lefsky, M., Mitchard, E. T. A., Salas, W., Zutta, B. R., Buermann, W., Lewis, S. L., Hagen, S., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1019576108 · Cited by 2,353
The SMOS Mission: New Tool for Monitoring Key Elements ofthe Global Water Cycle
Kerr, Y. H., Waldteufel, P., Wigneron, J.-P., Delwart, S., Cabot, F., Boutin, J., Escorihuela, M.-J., Font, J., Reul, N., Gruhier, C., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2010.2043032 · Cited by 1,988
Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps
Baccini, A., Goetz, S. J., Walker, W. S., Laporte, N. T., Sun, M., Sulla-Menashe, D., Hackler, J., Beck, P. S. A., Dubayah, R., Friedl, M. A., et al. (2012) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1354 · Cited by 1,788
Giglio, L., Randerson, J. T., & van der Werf, G. R. (2013) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences · doi:10.1002/jgrg.20042 · Cited by 1,605
Cited by
Friedlingstein, P., O'Sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., Andrew, R. M., Bakker, D. C. E., Hauck, J., Landschützer, P., Le Quéré, C., Luijkx, I. T., Peters, G. P., et al. (2023) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023 · Cited by 1,500
Self-citationUnexpectedly large impact of forest management and grazing on global vegetation biomass
Erb, K.-H., Kastner, T., Plutzar, C., Bais, A. L. S., Carvalhais, N., Fetzel, T., Gingrich, S., Haberl, H., Lauk, C., Niedertscheider, M., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25138 · Cited by 727
“For two of the actual biomass stock maps, we could isolate and quantify the impact of individual land-use types, that is, the maps based on consistent, detailed land-use information (actual biomass stock maps 1 and 2).”
InfluentialVegetation structural change since 1981 significantly enhanced the terrestrial carbon sink
Chen, J. M., Ju, W., Ciais, P., Viovy, N., Liu, R., Liu, Y., & Lu, X. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12257-8 · Cited by 492
Schneider, T., Lan, S., Stuart, A., & Teixeira, J. (2017) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2017gl076101 · Cited by 391
Jones, C. D., Arora, V., Friedlingstein, P., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Dunne, J., Graven, H., Hoffman, F., Ilyina, T., John, J. G., et al. (2016) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-9-2853-2016 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Bloom, A. A., Exbrayat, J.-F., van der Velde, I. R., Feng, L., & Williams, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2016-01-19
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1285-1290
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2258277964
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 22.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The decadal state of the terrestrial carbon cycle: Global retrievals of terrestrial carbon allocation, pools, and residence times. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1515160113
- The paper
- Bloom, A. A., Exbrayat, J.-F., van der Velde, I. R., Feng, L., & Williams, M. (2016). The decadal state of the terrestrial carbon cycle: Global retrievals of terrestrial carbon allocation, pools, and residence times. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515160113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
