Cited by 97Plant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil and Unsaturated Flow

An evaluation of abiotic carbon sinks in deserts

Open access
Schlesinger, William H.·2017·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Abstract Recent field studies have reported anomalous CO2 uptake using eddy‐covariance techniques in arid and semiarid ecosystems. The rates of CO2 uptake are incompatible with changes in situ of organic carbon pools. Here, I examine several potential mechanisms of abiotic CO2 uptake in arid and semiarid soils: atmospheric pressure pumping, carbonate dissolution, and percolation of soil water through the vadose zone. Each mechanism is deemed inadequate to explain the observations of the eddy‐covariance systems, which must now be questioned for their accuracy in desert ecosystems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcb.13336

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Water passage through carbonate rocks enhances dissolution of carbonates into water.

    “In addition, water passage through these rocks enhanced the dissolution of carbonates into the water [34,35].”

    From Advanced Oxidation Processes for Degradation of Water Pollutants—Ambivalent Impact of Carbonate Species: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [34]

    The paper’s Abstract describes dissolution of soil carbonates and leaching of the resulting calcium and bicarbonate through the soil profile. It does not say that water passing through carbonate rocks enhances dissolution; its discussion concerns carbonate deposits in arid soils rather than rocks. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schlesinger, W. H.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Schlesinger, William H.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-07-09
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
25-27
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2346546693
Cited by
97
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Keywords
desert ecosystems, arid and semi-arid soils, CO2 uptake, eddy covariance, carbonate dissolution, vadose zone, soil water percolation, soil organic carbon
MeSH terms
Carbon, Desert Climate, Soil, Soil Microbiology, Ecosystem, Carbon Sequestration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review